A randomized controlled trial of inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers.

A randomized controlled trial of inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/ccp0000312
复制
发表时间:
2018-12
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Field M
Field M
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jones A;McGrath E;Robinson E;Houben K;Nederkoorn C;Field M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了互联网提供的三种类型的抑制性控制训练(ICT)和主动控制干预对社区问题饮酒者饮酒的影响。方法:对246名有戒酒动机的重度饮酒者(平均年龄41.32岁,女性130人)进行为期1周的自我饮酒监测,然后随机接受ICT(Associative No-Go、Associative Stop Signal、General Inhibition)三种不同类型的ICT中的一种或一种积极对照。然后,参与者在为期4周的时间里在互联网上完成最多14次ICT/控制会议,同时定期记录他们的饮酒情况。结果:在为期4周的训练期间,所有组的饮酒量均显著减少(时间的主效应,F(2,402)=77.12,p<.01,ηp2=.28,BF10>99),但ICT组之间以及ICT组与主动对照组之间的差异无统计学意义(组×时间互动,F(6,402)=1.10,p=.36,ηp2=0.02,BF10=0.03)。与假设相反,ICT后,总体抑制控制、酒精暗示的解除抑制效果或酒精情感联系没有变化。结论:在这项试图将概念验证实验室研究的结果转化为可行的行为改变干预的研究中,我们发现,通过互联网提供的多次ICT除了与参与试验相关的非特定影响外,并不能帮助酗酒者减少饮酒。这项随机对照试验的结果表明,抑制控制培训(ICT)是一种新型的互联网传递的行为干预,旨在改善抑制控制,除了参与试验和定期自我监控酒精消费相关的非特定影响外,它并不能帮助问题饮酒者减少酒精摄入量。这些发现表明,如果要将实验室环境中制定的干预措施转化为适合远程分娩的有效行为改变干预措施,可能需要进行实质性修改。
Objective: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of three types of Internet-delivered Inhibitory Control Training (ICT) with each other and with an active control intervention on alcohol consumption in a community sample of problem drinkers. Method: Two hundred and 46 heavy drinkers, who were motivated to reduce their alcohol consumption (mean age 41.32, 130 female) self-monitored their alcohol consumption for 1 week before being randomized to receive 1 of 3 variants of ICT (Associative No-Go, Associative Stop Signal, General Inhibition) or an active control. Participants then completed up to 14 ICT/control sessions on the Internet over a 4-week period, while regularly recording their alcohol consumption. Results: There were significant reductions in alcohol consumption across all groups over the 4-week training period (main effect of time, F(2, 402) = 77.12, p < .01, ηp2 = .28, BF10 > 99), however there were no differences between ICT groups, or between ICT groups and the active control group (Group × Time interaction, F(6, 402) = 1.10, p = .36, ηp2 = .02, BF10 = 0.03). Contrary to hypotheses, there were no changes in general inhibitory control, the disinhibiting effects of alcohol cues, or alcohol affective associations after ICT. Conclusions: In this study, which attempted to translate findings from proof-of-concept laboratory studies into a viable behavior change intervention, we found that multiple sessions of ICT delivered over the Internet did not help heavy drinkers to reduce their alcohol consumption beyond nonspecific effects associated with taking part in a trial. Findings from this randomized controlled trial demonstrated that Inhibitory Control Training (ICT), a novel Internet-delivered behavioral intervention that is intended to improve inhibitory control, did not help problem drinkers to reduce their alcohol consumption beyond the nonspecific effects associated with taking part in a trial and regular self-monitoring of alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that interventions developed in laboratory settings may require substantial modification if they are to be translated info effective behavior change interventions suited for remote delivery.
DOI: 10.2196/games.5708
发表时间: 2016-07-01
期刊: JMIR SERIOUS GAMES
影响因子: 4
作者:
Blackburne, Tegan;Rodriguez, Alexandra;Johnstone, Stuart John
通讯作者: Johnstone, Stuart John
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2689-x
发表时间: 2012-06
期刊: PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Bickel, Warren K.;Jarmolowicz, David P.;Mueller, E. Terry;Gatchalian, Kirstin M.;McClure, Samuel M.
通讯作者: McClure, Samuel M.
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.55
发表时间: 2000-01-01
期刊: JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL
影响因子: --
作者:
Babor, TF;Steinberg, K;Del Boca, F
通讯作者: Del Boca, F
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.03.008
发表时间: 2015-12-01
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Boendermaker, Wouter J.;Prins, Pier J. M.;Wiers, Reinout W.
通讯作者: Wiers, Reinout W.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x
发表时间: 1999-03-01
期刊: ADDICTION
影响因子: 6
作者:
Carter, BL;Tiffany, ST
通讯作者: Tiffany, ST