Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis.

Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-19
期刊:
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jebb SA
Jebb SA
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bianchi F;Dorsel C;Garnett E;Aveyard P;Jebb SA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

减少肉类消费有助于预防非传染性疾病和保护环境。针对有意识的人类行为决定因素的干预措施通常是可接受的促进饮食改变的方法,但对其减少肉类需求的有效性知之甚少。评估针对人类行为有意识决定因素的干预措施的有效性,以减少对肉类的需求。我们使用预定义算法于2017年8月31日检索6个电子数据库,筛选可公开访问的资源,联系作者,并进行向前和向后参考检索。与对照条件、基线期或其他符合条件的干预措施相比,合格的研究采用实验设计来评估针对人类行为有意识决定因素的干预措施,以减少肉类的消费、购买或选择。我们以叙述的方式综合了结果,并进行了探索性薯片集定性比较分析,以确定与肉类需求显著减少相关的干预特征组合。我们纳入了24篇报告了59项干预措施和25,477项观察结果的论文。自我监控干预和个人生活方式咨询导致或与减少肉类消费有关。提供有关吃肉的健康或环境后果的信息与虚拟环境中消费和选择肉类的意愿降低有关,但没有证据表明这种方法影响了实际行为。关于吃肉对动物福利的影响的教育与减少吃肉的意图有关,而含蓄地强调动物痛苦的干预则与此无关。关于吃肉的多重后果的教育导致了复杂的结果。量身定制的教育并没有发现减少实际或预期的肉类消费,尽管很少有研究评估这种方法。一些针对人类行为有意识决定因素的干预措施有可能减少对肉类的需求。特别是,自我监测干预和个人生活方式咨询可以帮助减少肉类消费。有证据表明,在虚拟环境中,一些教育信息在减少预期消费和肉类选择方面是有效的。CRD42017076720。本文的在线版本(10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。
Reducing meat consumption can help prevent non-communicable diseases and protect the environment. Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour are generally acceptable approaches to promote dietary change, but little is known about their effectiveness to reduce the demand for meat. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat. We searched six electronic databases on the 31st of August 2017 with a predefined algorithm, screened publicly accessible resources, contacted authors, and conducted forward and backward reference searches. Eligible studies employed experimental designs to evaluate interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the consumption, purchase, or selection of meat in comparison to a control condition, a baseline period, or relative to other eligible interventions. We synthesised results narratively and conducted an exploratory crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify combinations of intervention characteristics associated with significant reductions in the demand for meat. We included 24 papers reporting on 59 interventions and 25,477 observations. Self-monitoring interventions and individual lifestyle counselling led to, or were associated with reduced meat consumption. Providing information about the health or environmental consequences of eating meat was associated with reduced intentions to consume and select meat in virtual environments, but there was no evidence to suggest this approach influenced actual behaviour. Education about the animal welfare consequences of eating meat was associated with reduced intentions to consume meat, while interventions implicitly highlighting animal suffering were not. Education on multiple consequences of eating meat led to mixed results. Tailored education was not found to reduce actual or intended meat consumption, though few studies assessed this approach. Some interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour have the potential to reduce the demand for meat. In particular, self-monitoring interventions and individual lifestyle counselling can help to reduce meat consumption. There was evidence of effectiveness of some educational messages in reducing intended consumption and selection of meat in virtual environments. CRD42017076720. The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
DOI: 10.1177/1359105307078174
发表时间: 2007-07-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
French, David P.;Cooke, Richard;Sutton, Stephen
通讯作者: Sutton, Stephen
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4836
发表时间: 2015-11-10
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
Flores Mateo G;Granado-Font E;Ferré-Grau C;Montaña-Carreras X
通讯作者: Montaña-Carreras X
DOI: 10.2147/idr.s55778
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Economou V;Gousia P
通讯作者: Gousia P
DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0474
发表时间: 2002-04-01
期刊: APPETITE
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Allen, MW;Baines, S
通讯作者: Baines, S
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.025
发表时间: 2017-10-01
期刊: APPETITE
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Carfora, V.;Caso, D.;Conner, M.
通讯作者: Conner, M.