Examining the relationship between processing fluency and memory for source information.

Examining the relationship between processing fluency and memory for source information.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1098/rsos.190430
复制
发表时间:
2021-04-21
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Shanks DR
Shanks DR
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Huang TS;Shanks DR

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

在项目再认测试中,基于熟悉度的加工过程(如加工流畅性)会影响记忆判断。许多传统的帐户的源记忆假设最小的影响,熟悉的源记忆,但最近的工作表明,源记忆的判断受到影响时,测试刺激处理更流畅的结果启动。本实验考察了流畅性与源记忆决策准确性之间的关系。参与者研究了具有不同来源属性的单词。在测试过程中,他们通过渐进式解蔽识别出屏幕上逐渐清晰的单词,进行旧/新和源记忆判断,并报告这些单词的置信度。从项目识别任务记录的响应时间(RT)形成的流畅性措施的基础上,和识别RT进行了比较项目识别,源的准确性和信心的类别。与无法准确检索源信息的试验相比,正确检索源信息的试验中识别RT更快。这些发现与基于熟悉性的加工与源记忆判断有关的假设是一致的。
Familiarity-based processes such as processing fluency can influence memory judgements in tests of item recognition. Many conventional accounts of source memory assume minimal influence of familiarity on source memory, but recent work has suggested that source memory judgements are affected when test stimuli are processed with greater fluency as a result of priming. The present experiments investigated the relationship between fluency and the accuracy of source memory decisions. Participants studied words presented with different source attributes. During test, they identified words that gradually clarified on screen through progressive demasking, made old/new and source memory judgements, and reported confidence ratings for those words. Response times (RTs) recorded from the item identification task formed the basis of a fluency measure, and identification RTs were compared across categories of item recognition, source accuracy and confidence. Identification RTs were faster in trials with correct retrieval of source information compared with trials for which source could not be accurately retrieved. These findings are consistent with the assumption that familiarity-based processes are related to source memory judgements.
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.6.4.306
发表时间: 2006-12-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Davidson, Patrick S. R.;McFarland, Craig R.;Glisky, Elizabeth L.
通讯作者: Glisky, Elizabeth L.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.91
发表时间: 1988-01-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
DUNN, JC;KIRSNER, K
通讯作者: KIRSNER, K
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2532
发表时间: 1997-11-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Guttentag, RE;Carroll, D
通讯作者: Carroll, D
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.006
发表时间: 2007-10-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Cohn, Melanie;Moscovitch, Morris
通讯作者: Moscovitch, Morris
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730
发表时间: 2008-07
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Diana RA;Yonelinas AP;Ranganath C
通讯作者: Ranganath C