Public support for the judicial branches under the COVID-19 pandemic

Public support for the judicial branches under the COVID-19 pandemic
复制标题

COVID-19 大流行期间公众对司法部门的支持

DOI:
10.1080/17457289.2021.1924729
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ishima Hideo
Ishima Hideo
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shigemura Sohei;Iseki Tatsuya;Ikeda Shun;Ishima Hideo

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

在民主国家,公众对司法机构的支持对于防止政府滥用权力至关重要。面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,政府可能会过度限制其公民防止传染病传播的权利。本研究考察了如果法院判定政府限制他们的权利是非法的,并取消了规避风险的政策,选民是否会支持法院的裁决。我们假设面临疫情风险的选民会支持一个拥有预防疫情的专业知识和资源的政府,我们设定了以下假设:如果法院取消了针对COVID-19的措施,公众不会支持法院,政府不遵守法院的裁决不会减少对政府的支持。我们发现支持这些假设的背景下,对选民的权利的限制程度是弱的。由于“民众支持法院”与“政府滥权”之间存在密切关系,我们需要考虑哪些因素决定了民众对法院的支持。
In democratic countries, public support for the judiciary is crucial to prevent abuse of power by the government. While facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, governments may overly restrict their citizens’ rights to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. This study examined whether voters would support a court's ruling if the court decided that the government's restriction of their rights was illegal and nullified the risk-averse policies. We suppose that voters faced with the risk of a pandemic will support a government with the expertise and resources to prevent a pandemic, and we set up the following hypotheses: If the courts nullify the measures against COVID-19, the public will not support the courts, and the government's failure to comply with the court's ruling will not diminish support for the government. We find support for these hypotheses in the contexts wherein the degree of restriction on voters’ rights is weak. Because there is a close relationship between “public support for the court” and “government abuse of power,” we need to consider which factors determine support for the court.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Douglas M. Gibler;K. Randazzo
通讯作者: K. Randazzo
最高法院的来源线索和公众支持
DOI: 10.1177/1532673x14560809
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
T. Clark;Jonathan P. Kastellec
通讯作者: Jonathan P. Kastellec
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055419000704
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 6.8
作者:
Brandon L. Bartels;Eric Kramon
通讯作者: Eric Kramon
安理会授权负面意外:英国和法国的否决权是否影响了公众对美国军事行动的支持?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Naoko Matsumura;Atsushi Tago
通讯作者: Atsushi Tago
墨西哥的司法权与战略沟通:司法合法性的跨国分析
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Jeffrey K. Staton
通讯作者: Jeffrey K. Staton