Defining Success in the Commons: Addressing Problem Orientations, Multidimensionality, Norms, and Tradeoffs
Defining Success in the Commons: Addressing Problem Orientations, Multidimensionality, Norms, and Tradeoffs
复制标题
定义公共领域的成功：解决问题导向、多维性、规范和权衡
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
C. Whitney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Barnett;Stefan Partelow;Ulrich J. Frey;Alejandro García;María del Mar Mancha;Christoph Oberlack;Elicia Ratajczyk;Hillary Smith;S. Villamayor‐Tomas;C. Whitney
公地和社会生态系统研究探讨管理自然资源的制度安排，以改善社会和生态成果。然而，成功并没有一个普遍的定义。我们研究CPR和SES综合文献，以确定趋势，差距和挑战，研究成功。我们致力于：（1）文献中的空白，（2）多维性和权衡，以及（3）问题导向和成功定义之间的联系。为了做到这一点，我们进行了一个全面的审查大N的研究，荟萃分析和CPR和SES治理（n = 45）的系统性评价。我们发现成功的七个方面，对应于集体选择，宪法和业务水平，时间维度，社会经济成果。大多数研究没有涉及权力和权衡，也没有具体说明成功适用于哪些社会群体。大多数研究在一个维度上定义了成功，最常见的是需求方供应（例如，生物多样性（biodiversity）。回归分析表明，对牧场或草地的研究、相关研究和/或对国家财产制度的研究（即，保护区）更有可能使用较少的成功维度。问题导向往往没有相关的尺寸在一项研究中考虑的成功，这表明，成功的措施往往不能充分解决的综合研究中认识到的全套问题。这对旨在发展SES和CPR治理一般知识的学者的集体行动提出了重大挑战。我们讨论了典型的研究，衡量成功的多维，解决权力和权衡，并得出结论，推进成功的分析四项建议。
Commons and social-ecological systems research examines institutional arrangements for governing natural resources to improve social and ecological outcomes. However, no universal definition of success exists. We examine the CPR and SES synthesis literature to identify trends, gaps and challenges for examining success. We address: (1) gaps in the literature, (2) multidimensionality and tradeoffs, and (3) and the link between problem orientation and definitions of success. To do this we conduct a comprehensive review of Large-N studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews of CPR and SES governance (n = 45). We found seven dimensions of success, corresponding to collective choice, constitutional and operational levels, temporal dimensions, and socio-economic outcomes. Most studies did not address power and tradeoffs, or specify the social groups to whom success would apply. The majority of studies defined success in one dimension, most often demand-side provisioning (e.g., productivity or biodiversity). A regression analysis suggests that studies on rangelands or grasslands, correlative studies, and/or studies of state property systems (i.e., protected areas) were more likely to use fewer dimensions of success. Problem orientations often did not correlate with dimensions of success considered in a study, suggesting that measures of success often cannot adequately address the full suite of problems recognized in synthesis research. This presents a significant challenge for collective action among scholars who aim to develop general knowledge on SES and CPR governance. We discuss exemplary studies that measure success as multidimensional, address power and tradeoffs, and conclude with four recommendations for advancing the analysis of success.
影响因子：
64.8
作者：
Cinner, Joshua E.;Huchery, Cindy;Mouillot, David
通讯作者：
Mouillot, David
影响因子：
6
作者：
Nilsson, Mans;Chisholm, Elinor;Stafford-Smith, Mark
通讯作者：
Stafford-Smith, Mark