The Theory of Planned Behavior and E-cig Use: Impulsive Personality, E-cig Attitudes, and E-cig Use.

The Theory of Planned Behavior and E-cig Use: Impulsive Personality, E-cig Attitudes, and E-cig Use.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s11469-017-9783-6
复制
发表时间:
2018-04
影响因子:
8
通讯作者:
Cyders MA
Cyders MA
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hershberger A;Connors M;Um M;Cyders MA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本论文运用计划行为理论(TPB)来理解冲动性人格特征和使用电子烟的态度与使用电子烟的可能性之间的关系。714名参与者(平均年龄= 34.04,SD = 10.89,女性48.6%)完成了电子烟使用态度(CEAC)和短UPPS-P冲动行为量表的横断面测量。结构路径分析表明,紧迫感和尽责性缺失与电子烟态度显著相关(CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.02;紧迫感:β = 0.32, p = 0.001;尽责性缺失:β = - 0.48, p < 0.001)。电子烟使用者的电子烟态度得分显著高于非电子烟使用者,β = 0.85, p < 0.001。冲动性格特征与电子烟使用之间没有明显的直接联系。研究结果初步支持了一个模型,即冲动特征通过积极的电子烟态度与电子烟使用有关。
The current paper applied the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand how impulsive personality traits and attitudes concerning e-cig use relate to the likelihood of electronic cigarette (e-cig) use. Seven hundred and fourteen participants (Mean age = 34.04, SD = 10.89, 48.6% female) completed cross-sectional measures of e-cig use attitudes (CEAC) and the Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. A structural path analysis suggested that urgency and deficits in conscientiousness were significantly related to e-cig attitudes (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.02; urgency: β = 0.32, p = .001; deficits in conscientiousness: β = −0.48, p < .001). E-cig attitude scores were significantly higher for e-cig users than non-users, β = 0.85, p < .001. There was no significant direct path from impulsive personality traits to e-cig use. Findings provide initial support for a model in which impulsive traits are related to e-cig use through positive e-cig attitudes.
年轻成人非吸烟者的电子烟广告曝光和隐性态度。
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.008
发表时间: 2016-06-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Pokhrel, Pallav;Fagan, Pebbles;Herzog, Thaddeus A.;Chen, Qimei;Muranaka, Nicholas;Kehl, Lisa;Unger, Jennifer B.
通讯作者: Unger, Jennifer B.
DOI: 10.1037/a0028085
发表时间: 2012-09-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Meade, Adam W.;Craig, S. Bartholomew
通讯作者: Craig, S. Bartholomew
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.105
发表时间: 2004-02-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Kraut, R;Olson, J;Couper, M
通讯作者: Couper, M
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.005
发表时间: 2015-09-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Cohn, Amy;Villanti, Andrea;Mermelstein, Robin
通讯作者: Mermelstein, Robin
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.031
发表时间: 2015-02-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Hendricks, Peter S.;Cases, Mallory G.;Bailey, William C.
通讯作者: Bailey, William C.