Drifting in and out of Dealing - results on career dynamics from the TDID project

Drifting in and out of Dealing - results on career dynamics from the TDID project
复制标题

进出交易行业 - TDID 项目的职业动态结果

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_6
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Müller
Müller
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Müller

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这一章考察了人们进入和退出以营利为目的的毒品交易的方式。来自德国TDID研究项目的114名答复者提供了有关进入非法药物销售的信息,同时对较小的子样本进行了分析,以了解其交易活动的加剧、减少和/或停止。所有受访者都是娱乐性吸毒者。墨菲等人描述的三种进入毒品交易的模式。在我们的分析中也出现了他的论文“漂流到交易”(1990)(藏货商,中间人,鉴赏家)。除此之外,还考察了四种更重要的类型(供应保证、冒险家、金钱驱动、经销商名声)。相当一部分被调查者的毒品交易动机是多种因素的组合,其中需求拉动、金钱驱动、供给诱导、压力缓解和名声效应是促使被调查者加强毒品交易活动的主要原因。进入毒品市场的方式以及加强毒品市场的方式大多可以说是一种“漂移”:绝大多数人都是在无意中逐渐养成了有规律的越轨行为,“漂移”的概念对于摆脱毒品交易的方式甚至更为重要:绝大多数人将其描述为在“逐渐摆脱”经常非法药物使用的背景下一个相当不稳定的过程,通常包括几种动机,如生活过程的变化、害怕被发现、社会压力、与朋友和商业伙伴关系的变化或自我感觉。少数人提到了一个阻止交易活动的关键经验,这主要与执法活动有关。漂流过程的一个显著特征是,对许多受访者来说,从吸毒到社会供应,到盈利,再到增加销售量,并不被视为进一步进入“真实的”越轨行为。只有少数受试者发展出“真实的”越轨身份,其中一些人珍惜在越轨环境中的地位。
This chapter examines the ways in which people got in and out of profit-oriented drug dealing. 114 respondents from the German TDID research project gave information about getting into the selling of illicit drugs, while smaller subsamples were analysed for the intensification, reduction and/or cessation of their dealing activity. All respondents were recreational drug users.Three modes of entry into drug dealing described in Murphy et al.’s paper “drifting into dealing” (1990) also emerged in our analysis (stash-dealer, go-between, connoisseur). In addition to these, four more significant types were examined (supply guarantee, adventurer, money-driven, dealer fame). A significant part of the respondents showed a combination of several motives for their entry into drug dealing.Reasons why respondents intensified their dealing activities weredemand-pull increase, money-driven, supply-induced, stress reduction, and dealer-fame. The modes of entry as well as the modes of intensification could be mostly described as a drift: a vast majority successively got into regular deviant behaviour, often rather unintentionally.The notion of drift is even more important for the ways of exiting drug dealing: A vast majority described it as a rather fluid process in the context of “maturing out” of regular illicit drug use, usually including several motives such as changes in life course, fear of discovery, social stress, changes in relations with friends and business partners, or self-perception. A minority referred to one crucial experience for stopping dealing activities, this was mostly related to law enforcement activities.A remarkable feature of the drifting process is that for many respondents, progressions from drug use to social supply, to making profit, to increasing sales volumes were not regarded as a further step into “real” deviance. Only a few subjects developed a “real” deviant identity, some of them cherishing the status in a deviant setting.
DOI: 10.1177/002204260703700406
发表时间: 2007-09-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Coomber, Ross;Turnbull, Paul
通讯作者: Turnbull, Paul
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
U. Kemmesies
通讯作者: U. Kemmesies
涉足交易:成为可卡因卖家
DOI: --
发表时间: 1990
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Sheigla Murphy;D. Waldorf;C. Reinarman
通讯作者: C. Reinarman
从“社会供给”到“实物交易”
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Taylor;G. Potter
通讯作者: G. Potter
边沁的制裁类型与限制性威慑
DOI: 10.1177/0022042613497936
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Scott Jacques;Andrea Allen
通讯作者: Andrea Allen