Are Rurality, Area Deprivation, Access to Outside Space, and Green Space Associated with Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross Sectional Study (CHARIS-E).
Are Rurality, Area Deprivation, Access to Outside Space, and Green Space Associated with Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross Sectional Study (CHARIS-E).
复制标题
COVID-19 大流行期间，农村、地区剥夺、进入外部空间和绿色空间是否与心理健康相关？横断面研究 (CHARIS-E)。
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18083869
复制
发表时间：
2021-04-07
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dixon D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hubbard G;Daas CD;Johnston M;Murchie P;Thompson CW;Dixon D
该研究调查了乡村生活、区域剥夺、进入外部空间（研究1）以及访问绿色空间的频率和持续时间（研究2）是否与COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康相关，并检查了个体人口统计数据（年龄、性别、COVID-19屏蔽状态）和疾病信念是否与COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康直接相关。2020年6月至7月期间，在苏格兰对随机选择的成年人进行了一项连续、每周、全国代表性、横断面、观察性研究。如果可用的话，验证工具被用来测量心理困扰，个人人口统计学，疾病信念，和以下特征：农村，区域剥夺，获得住宅外部空间，访问频率，并在绿色空间的持续时间。进行简单的线性回归，然后检查适度效应。研究1共有2969名受试者，其中1765名（59.6%）为女性，349名（11.9%）为屏蔽类受试者，中位年龄为54岁。研究2共有502名参与者，其中295名（58.60%）为女性，58名（11.6%）属于屏蔽类别，中位年龄为53岁。直接影响表明，如果参与者报告以下情况，心理困扰会更严重：城市，在贫困地区，无法进入或共享住宅外部空间，较少访问绿色空间（环境），年轻，女性，处于屏蔽类别（人口统计学），更严重的疾病（COVID-19）表示，以及更大的威胁感知（疾病信念）。适度性分析表明，环境因素放大了个体因素对心理困扰的直接影响。这项研究为公共卫生和环境规划，设计和管理提供了指导，包括住房设计和公共开放空间的提供和监管。
The study investigated if rurality, area deprivation, access to outside space (Study 1), and frequency of visiting and duration in green space (Study 2) are associated with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and examined if individual demographics (age, gender, COVID-19 shielding status) and illness beliefs have a direct association with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. A serial, weekly, nationally representative, cross-sectional, observational study of randomly selected adults was conducted in Scotland during June and July 2020. If available, validated instruments were used to measure psychological distress, individual demographics, illness beliefs, and the following characteristics: Rurality, area deprivation, access to residential outside space, frequency of visiting, and duration in green space. Simple linear regressions followed by examination of moderation effect were conducted. There were 2969 participants in Study 1, of which 1765 (59.6%) were female, 349 (11.9%) were in the shielding category, and the median age was 54 years. There were 502 participants in Study 2, of which 295 (58.60%) were female, 58 (11.6%) were in shielding category, and the median age was 53 years. Direct effects showed that psychological distress was worse if participants reported the following: Urban, in a deprived area, no access to or sharing residential outside space, fewer visits to green space (environment), younger, female, in the shielding category (demographics), worse illness (COVID-19) representations, and greater threat perception (illness beliefs). Moderation analyses showed that environmental factors amplified the direct effects of the individual factors on psychological distress. This study offers pointers for public health and for environmental planning, design, and management, including housing design and public open space provision and regulation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Hubbard G;den Daas C;Johnston M;Dixon D
通讯作者：
Dixon D
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Den Daas C;Hubbard G;Johnston M;Dixon D;CHARIS Consortium
通讯作者：
CHARIS Consortium
影响因子：
10.5
作者：
Allardyce, J;Gilmour, H;McCreadie, RG
通讯作者：
McCreadie, RG
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Levin, KA;Leyland, AH
通讯作者：
Leyland, AH
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph17165728
发表时间：
2020-08-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ding, Yubin;Xu, Junling;Xie, Shenghua
通讯作者：
Xie, Shenghua