Impact of a physician recommendation on COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals.

Impact of a physician recommendation on COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.013
复制
发表时间:
2023-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Mazor, Kathleen M.
Mazor, Kathleen M.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fisher, Kimberly A.;Nguyen, Ngoc;Fouayzi, Hassan;Singh, Sonal;Crawford, Sybil;Mazor, Kathleen M.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了测试不同医生建议对新冠肺炎疫苗迟疑的影响。我们在在线研究平台Proliffe上进行了一项基于Vignette的实验调查。新冠肺炎疫苗方面犹豫不决,成年专家小组成员被分配到五条信息中的一条,这五条信息的推荐风格(参与式和显式)和策略(承认担忧;与流感疫苗进行比较;声明数百万人已经接种;强调保护他人)各不相同。疫苗的犹豫不决被重新评估为一个问题,“你会在这次访问中接种疫苗吗?”在752名参与者中,60.1%是女性,43.4%是黑人,23.6%是拉丁裔,33.0%是白人;平均年龄为35.6岁。总体而言,最初“不确定”的33.1%和最初“不确定”的13.1%的参与者在接受任何建议后都变得不那么犹豫了。在“不确定”的参与者中,20.3%的人在接受参与性建议的人中变得不那么犹豫,相比之下,34.3%的−和39.5%的人接受了明确的建议。“保护他人”的信息在最初“不”的参与者中最有效;19.8%的参与者变得不那么犹豫,相比之下,参与性建议的参与者只有8.7%。医生的建议可能会减少新冠肺炎疫苗的犹豫。明确的推荐和“保护他人”似乎是医生推荐接种新冠肺炎疫苗的重要元素。
To test the impact of varied physician recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We conducted a vignette-based experimental survey on Prolific, an online research platform. COVID-19 vaccine hesitant, adult panel members were assigned to one of five messages that varied by recommendation style (participatory vs explicit) and strategy (acknowledgement of concerns; comparison to the flu shot; statement that millions of people have already received it; emphasis on protecting others). Vaccine hesitancy was re-assessed with the question, “Would you get vaccinated at this visit?”. Of the 752 participants, 60.1% were female, 43.4% Black, 23.6% Latino, and 33.0% White; mean age was 35.6 years. Overall, 33.1% of the initially “not sure” and 13.1% of the initially “no” participants became less hesitant following any recommendation. Among the “not sure” participants, 20.3% of those who received a participatory recommendation became less hesitant compared with 34.3%− 39.5% for the explicit recommendations. The “protect others” message was most effective among initially “no” participants; 19.8% become less hesitant, compared to 8.7% for the participatory recommendation. A physician recommendation may reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. An explicit recommendation and “protect others” message appear to be important elements of a physician recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination.
DOI: 10.7326/m20-3569
发表时间: 2020-12-15
影响因子: 39.2
作者:
Fisher, Kimberly A.;Bloomstone, Sarah J.;Mazor, Kathleen M.
通讯作者: Mazor, Kathleen M.
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0950
发表时间: 2011-11-01
期刊: PEDIATRICS
影响因子: 8
作者:
Dorell, Christina G.;Yankey, David;Markowitz, Lauri E.
通讯作者: Markowitz, Lauri E.
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.039
发表时间: 2021-12-03
期刊: Vaccine
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
James EK;Bokemper SE;Gerber AS;Omer SB;Huber GA
通讯作者: Huber GA
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2037
发表时间: 2013-12-01
期刊: PEDIATRICS
影响因子: 8
作者:
Opel, Douglas J.;Heritage, John;Robinson, Jeffrey D.
通讯作者: Robinson, Jeffrey D.
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.016
发表时间: 2018-02-01
期刊: VACCINE
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Lu, Peng-jun;Srivastav, Anup;Williams, Walter W.
通讯作者: Williams, Walter W.