Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children.
Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.001
复制
发表时间：
2014-03
期刊：
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Hauser, Peter C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dye, Matthew W. G.;Hauser, Peter C.
聋儿的特点是冲动、易分心、无法保持注意力。然而，过去的研究测试了听力正常的父母所生的聋哑儿童，他们可能经历了语言发育迟缓。本研究的目的是确定听觉输入的缺乏是否会调节没有延迟接触语言的聋儿的注意问题。两个版本的连续性能测试进行了管理，37名聋哑儿童出生的聋人父母和60名听力儿童，年龄均为6-13岁。警戒任务用于测量持续几分钟的注意力，而分心测试提供了忽略任务无关信息的能力-选择性注意力。这两项任务提供了通过分析委员会的错误认知控制的评估。失聪儿童和听力正常儿童在持续注意力的测量上没有差异。然而，年龄较小的聋儿更容易被他们周边视野中的任务无关信息分心，并且聋儿在选择性注意任务中产生了更多的委托错误。有人认为，这是不太可能的听力认知处理的影响，但可能反映了内源性控制的重新分配的视觉注意力资源的早期深度耳聋的困难。
Deaf children have been characterized as being impulsive, distractible, and unable to sustain attention. However, past research has tested deaf children born to hearing parents who are likely to have experienced language delays. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an absence of auditory input modulates attentional problems in deaf children with no delayed exposure to language. Two versions of a continuous performance test were administered to 37 deaf children born to Deaf parents and 60 hearing children, all aged 6–13 years. A vigilance task was used to measure sustained attention over the course of several minutes, and a distractibility test provided a measure of the ability to ignore task irrelevant information – selective attention. Both tasks provided assessments of cognitive control through analysis of commission errors. The deaf and hearing children did not differ on measures of sustained attention. However, younger deaf children were more distracted by task-irrelevant information in their peripheral visual field, and deaf children produced a higher number of commission errors in the selective attention task. It is argued that this is not likely to be an effect of audition on cognitive processing, but may rather reflect difficulty in endogenous control of reallocated visual attention resources stemming from early profound deafness.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Dye, Matthew W. G.;Bavelier, Daphne
通讯作者：
Bavelier, Daphne
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Codina, Charlotte;Buckley, David;Pascalis, Olivier
通讯作者：
Pascalis, Olivier
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Dye MW;Hauser PC;Bavelier D
通讯作者：
Bavelier D
影响因子：
1
作者：
CHESS, S;FERNANDEZ, P
通讯作者：
FERNANDEZ, P
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Emmorey K;Luk G;Pyers JE;Bialystok E
通讯作者：
Bialystok E