Are People with High and Low Mental Rotation Abilities Differently Susceptible to the Alignment Effect?
Are People with High and Low Mental Rotation Abilities Differently Susceptible to the Alignment Effect?
复制标题
心理旋转能力高和低的人对对齐效应的敏感度是否不同？
作者：
F. Pazzaglia;R. De Beni
我们调查了排列效应(Levine等人，1982实验心理学杂志：一般111,157-175)是否受心理旋转能力的影响。在两个实验中，一组在心理旋转任务中成绩高和低的本科生被要求学习图解(实验1)或更复杂的地图(实验2)，并采用一个可以与学习过程中假设的视角对齐、错位(45°、135°)或反对齐(180°)的视角来执行一些指向任务。空间表征中的认知风格也被考虑在内。实验一的结果表明，在心理旋转任务中表现较差的人更倾向于采用一种更关注地标的空间表征。它们在指向任务中的表现取决于对准条件，对齐条件下的误差较大，其次是两个未对准和对准的条件。相比之下，高能力的心理旋转者更喜欢测量和路线空间表征，并且只受对齐和不对齐条件的影响。在第二个实验中，练习作为心理旋转和排列的函数被研究。在四个学习阶段的最后阶段后，高心理旋转能力组被发现在指点任务中没有对齐效应。
We investigated whether the alignment effect (Levine et al, 1982 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111 157–175) is influenced by mental rotation abilities. In two experiments, groups of undergraduate students with high and low performance in mental rotation tasks were required to study either schematic (experiment 1) or more complex (experiment 2) maps, and to perform a number of pointing tasks adopting a perspective which could be aligned, misaligned (45°, 135°), or counteraligned (180°) with the perspective assumed during learning. Cognitive styles in spatial representation have also been considered. Results of experiment 1 show that people with low performance in mental rotation tasks prefer to adopt a representation of space focused more on landmarks. Their performance in the pointing tasks depends on the alignment conditions, with more errors in the counteraligned condition followed by the two misaligned and aligned ones. In contrast to this, high-ability mental rotators prefer survey and route spatial representations and are affected only by the aligned and non-aligned conditions. In the second experiment, practice was studied as a function of mental rotation and alignment. The group high in mental rotation ability was found to be free from the alignment effect in the pointing tasks performed after the final of four learning phases.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
LINN, MC;PETERSEN, AC
通讯作者：
PETERSEN, AC
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.215
发表时间：
1998-01-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B;McNamara, TP;Carr, W
通讯作者：
Carr, W
空间记忆中的方向特异性：是什么使路径与路径地图不同？
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.887
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Presson,CC;DeLange,N;Hazelrigg,MD
通讯作者：
Hazelrigg,MD