The European Union, security and the southern dimension

The European Union, security and the southern dimension
复制标题

欧盟、安全和南方层面

DOI:
10.1080/09662839.2010.534462
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Pace M
Pace M
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pace M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

随着“欧洲-地中海伙伴关系”的生效,欧洲联盟(欧盟)宣布了一种可以称之为“包容性的安全办法”,即这一政策框架是建立在所有有关各方对“合作安全”的共同承诺的基础上的。然而,欧盟在南部的实地行动表明,尽管有良好的意图,但到目前为止,这种合作安全努力几乎没有实现。结果却是一种“排他主义”政策,减少来自南方的非法移民是欧盟安全讨论的重中之重。9/11事件后,在“反恐”措施的政策领域,欧盟同样划分了“自由文明区”和“非自由文明区”,将反恐的肮脏工作留给了埃及和摩洛哥等国。在治理方面,这可以被描述为对安全的一种‘监督和控制’方法:因此,这里认为,欧盟通过其治理模式,实际上正在使南部地区进一步不安全和不稳定。本文追溯了欧盟(EU)安全治理相对于南部方面的形成,以欧洲为单位,通过多边/区域(欧洲-地中海伙伴关系(EMP)和最近的巴塞罗那进程:地中海联盟(UFM))和双边政策(欧洲睦邻政策(ENP))。通过使用话语分析,对欧盟文件进行了透彻的研究,以突出欧盟自己对安全(和稳定)的看法,以及在欧盟话语中,南部邻国的安全如何表面上与欧洲边界内的安全联系在一起。文章还参考了作者在布鲁塞尔、摩洛哥、埃及和巴勒斯坦的实地考察。欧盟倾向于以铁板一块的方式对待地中海沿岸国家,在其内部政治或对欧盟政策的敏感性、规范性或实质性方面,对南部地区国家几乎没有区别(Pace 2006)。简而言之,欧盟对南欧的政策至少在一定程度上受到这样一种想法的影响,即“我们的规模适合所有人”。因此,文章以欧盟设想的方式讨论了该区域。随着《欧洲安全管理计划》的生效,欧盟宣布了一种可以被称为对安全的‘包容性方法’,据此,这一政策框架是基于
With the coming into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the European Union (EU) annunciated what one could term an ‘inclusionist approach’to security whereby this policy framework was based on supposedly joint commitments by all parties concerned to ‘cooperative security’. However, EU actions on the ground in the south have shown that, despite good intentions, such cooperative security endeavours have, thus far, hardly materialised. The result instead is an ‘exclusionist’policy, where the reduction of illegal migration from the south takes top priority in EU security discourse. Post-9/11, in the policy area of ‘counter-terrorism’measures, the EU likewise demarcates ‘liberal zones of civilisation’from ‘illiberal’ones, leaving the dirty work of counter terrorism to countries such as Egypt and Morocco. In terms of governmentality, this may be described as a ‘surveillance and control’approach to security: therefore, it is argued here that the EU, through its governance model, is actually enabling further in-security and in-stability in the south.This article traces the formulation of the European Union’s (EU) security governance vis-a-vis the southern dimension, in European terms, through multilateral/regional (the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP) and the more recent Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean (UfM)) and bilateral policies (the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP)). Through the use of discourse analysis, EU documents are thoroughly examined to highlight the EU’s own perceptions on security (and stability) and how, in EU discourse, security in its southern neighbourhood is prima facie linked up with security within European borders. The article also draws upon the author’s field research in Brussels, Morocco, Egypt and Palestine. The EU tends to treat the littoral states of the Mediterranean in a monolithic way, making very little differentiation between the states of the southern neighbourhood in terms of their internal politics or susceptibility to EU policies Á normative or material (Pace 2006). Put shortly, EU policy towards the south is informed, at least partially, by the idea that ‘our size fits all’. The article therefore discusses the region in the manner in which it is conceived of by the EU. With the coming into force of the EMP, the EU annunciated what one could term an ‘inclusionist approach’to security whereby this policy framework was based on
欧洲正在形成
DOI: 10.1177/106591297402700230
发表时间: 1989
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
J. Galtung
通讯作者: J. Galtung
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Karen E. Smith
通讯作者: Karen E. Smith
规范从 EMP 转向 ENP:欧盟作为南方的规范企业家?
DOI: 10.1080/09557570701680704
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Michelle Pace
通讯作者: Michelle Pace
全球体系中的依赖性、依赖性和权力:结构和行为分析
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300003842
发表时间: 1978
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
James A. Caporaso
通讯作者: James A. Caporaso
迈向欧洲-地中海区域一体化
DOI: 10.1080/13629390008414705
发表时间: 2000
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Á. Vasconçelos;G. Joffẽ
通讯作者: G. Joffẽ