Vehicle product-line strategy under government subsidy programs for electric/hybrid vehicles
Vehicle product-line strategy under government subsidy programs for electric/hybrid vehicles
复制标题
电动/混合动力汽车政府补贴下的汽车产品线策略
DOI：
10.1016/j.tre.2020.102221
复制
发表时间：
2021-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jian Huang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Juan Zhang;Jian Huang
为了减少传统燃料汽车产生的碳排放，各国政府最近提出了各种补贴计划。推广电动/混合动力汽车(EVS)，如消费者补贴(CS)计划和研发补贴(RS)计划。在有补贴计划的情况下，汽车制造商将决定是开发还是调整他们的产品线，即是否生产传统燃料汽车(FV)和/或电动/混合动力汽车。我们发现，当制造商提高电动汽车节能水平的技术能力处于An时。在中级水平，她更愿意生产两种类型的汽车，否则，她会选择只提供一种类型的汽车。此外，与我们的直觉相反，我们认为政府的计划总是可以减少碳排放，我们发现CS和RS计划都可能对环境造成负面影响。只有当制造商决定同时提供电动汽车和FV时，这些计划才能有效地减少碳排放。此外，我们还表明，补贴计划的经济利益和环境利益可能并不总是一致的。我们从环境和经济两个角度推导了CS方案优于RS方案的条件。此外，我们还讨论了混合补贴计划(MS)，其中政府同时提供消费者补贴和研发补贴。我们讨论了这种混合方案是否能比CS和RS方案更有效地减少碳排放。
To reduce the carbon emissions produced by the traditional fuel-driven vehicles, governments have recently proposed various subsidy programs to . romote the electric/hybrid vehicles (EVs), such as the consumer subsidy (CS) program and the R&D subsidy (RS) program. In the presence of subsidy programs, vehicle manufacturers would decide whether to develop or adjust their product lines, i.e., whether to produce traditional fuel vehicles (FVs) and/or electric/hybrid vehicles. We show that when the manufacturer’s technology capacity for improving the energy-saving levels of EVs is at an . intermediate level, she prefers to produce both types of vehicles, and otherwise, she would choose to offer one type of vehicle only. Moreover, contrary to our intuition that the government programs can always decrease the carbon emissions, we find that both CS and RS programs might pose negative impacts on the environment. These programs can effectively reduce the carbon emissions only when the manufacturer decides to offer both EVs and FVs. Moreover, we show that the economic and environmental interests of the subsidy programs may not be always aligned. We derive the conditions under which the CS program can outperform the RS program from both the environmental and economic perspectives. In addition, we also discuss a mixed subsidy program (MS) wherein the government offers both a consumer subsidy and a R&D subsidy simultaneously. We discuss whether this mixed program can reduce carbon emissions more effectively than the CS and RS programs.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.1946256
发表时间：
2017-06
期刊：
Harvard Business School Working Papers
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. Drake
通讯作者：
D. Drake
绿色客户在竞争中的作用：喜忧参半？
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Zhou Yu
通讯作者：
Zhou Yu
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.3095306
发表时间：
2018-01
期刊：
Social Responsibility in Production & Supply Chain Management eJournal
影响因子：
--
作者：
Christopher S. Tang
通讯作者：
Christopher S. Tang
复杂网络中政府政策对电动汽车扩散影响的演化分析
影响因子：
9
作者：
Li, Jingjing;Jiao, Jianling;Tang, Yunshu
通讯作者：
Tang, Yunshu
DOI：
10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x
发表时间：
2003-03-01
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Brunnermeier, SB;Cohen, MA
通讯作者：
Cohen, MA