Are excluding e-cigarettes a loophole in the smokefree public housing rule?

Are excluding e-cigarettes a loophole in the smokefree public housing rule?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102069
复制
发表时间:
2023-02
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Bernat, Debra H.
Bernat, Debra H.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dearfield, Craig T.;Choi, Kelvin;Vivino, Anthony;Horn, Kimberly;Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.;Crandell, Ian;Bernat, Edward M.;Bernat, Debra H.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)要求所有公共住房当局在2017年2月开始的18个月实施期后于2018年7月成为无烟区。HUD规则包括所有可燃烟草产品;电子烟不包括在内。这项研究的目的是描述生活在公共住房中的烟草使用者实施无烟规则后电子烟的总体使用情况。数据收集自2018年7月至2021年11月期间居住在哥伦比亚特区住房管理局的396名成年(18岁以上)当前烟草使用者。措施包括电子烟的使用,开始使用的年龄,使用电子烟的原因,电子烟使用的易感性(非使用者)和社会人口特征。计算描述性和交叉表统计量以表征电子烟使用。近四分之一的烟草使用者报告终身使用电子烟(24%,n = 95),4.8%(n = 19)表示过去30天使用电子烟。在终身使用者中,有22人(23.2%)在无烟规定生效后开始使用,其中只有两名居民表示他们这样做是因为该规定。在从未使用过电子烟的人中,23.5%(n = 70)表示对电子烟感到好奇,10.7%(n = 40)表示他们可能在明年使用电子烟。结果表明,由于该规则,电子烟产品的使用率和吸收率都很低。很少有从未使用过电子烟的烟草使用者表示有意使用。结果表明,从HUD规则中省略电子烟并没有导致这些产品在该样本中的大量使用。
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) required all Public Housing Authorities to become smokefree in July 2018, following an 18-month implementation period that began February 2017. The HUD rule included all combustible tobacco products; e-cigarettes were not included. This purpose of this study is to characterize e-cigarette use overall and initiation after the implementation of the smokefree rule among tobacco users living in public housing. Data were collected from 396 adult (18+ years) current tobacco users at the time of rule implementation residing in the District of Columbia Housing Authority between July 2018 and November 2021. Measures include e-cigarette use, age of initiation, reasons for e-cigarette use, e-cigarette use susceptibility (among non-users), and sociodemographic characteristics. Descriptive and crosstab statistics were calculated to characterize e-cigarette use. Nearly-one-quarter of tobacco users reported lifetime use of e-cigarettes (24 %, n = 95) and 4.8 % (n = 19) indicated past 30-day e-cigarette use. Of the lifetime users, twenty-two (23.2 %) initiated their use after the smoke-free rule went into effect, with only two of those residents indicating they did so because of the rule. Of those who never used an e-cigarette, 23.5 % (n = 70) indicated being curious about e-cigarettes and 10.7 % (n = 40) said they may use e-cigarettes in the next year. Results indicate low use of e-cigarette products and low uptake due to the rule. Few tobacco users who never used e-cigarettes indicated intentions to use. Results suggest that omitting e-cigarettes from the HUD rule has not led to significant use of these products in this sample.
DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.41.5.7
发表时间: 2017-09-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Nicksic, Nicole E.;Snell, L. Morgan;Barnes, Andrew J.
通讯作者: Barnes, Andrew J.
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305999
发表时间: 2021-02-01
影响因子: 12.7
作者:
Wang, Richard J.;Bhadriraju, Sudhamayi;Glantz, Stanton A.
通讯作者: Glantz, Stanton A.
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty214
发表时间: 2020-05-01
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Cantrell, Jennifer;Huang, Jidong;Vallone, Donna
通讯作者: Vallone, Donna
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18178908
发表时间: 2021-08-24
影响因子: --
作者:
Horn K;Johnson SB;Patiño SR;Krost K;Gray T;Dearfield C;Du C;Bernat D
通讯作者: Bernat D
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.12.013
发表时间: 2017-04-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Hooper, Monica Webb;Kolar, Stephanie K.
通讯作者: Kolar, Stephanie K.