Reanalysis and Limited Repair Parsing: Leaping off the Garden Path
Reanalysis and Limited Repair Parsing: Leaping off the Garden Path
复制标题
重新分析和有限修复解析：跨越花园小径
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9_8
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Richard L. Lewis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richard L. Lewis
本章发展了一种称为有限修复解析的重新分析理论。当所选择的结构后来被证明不一致时，修复解析器通过修改先前构建的结构来部分处理局部歧义问题。这种对现有结构的修改将修复解析与并行或多路径解析、最小承诺解析、回溯或重新解析策略区分开来。修复能力有限的解析器在心理语言学上很重要，因为它们可以潜在地解释困难的花园路径结构（当修复失败时）和无问题的局部歧义（当修复成功或容易时）之间的对比。尽管修复的想法已经隐含在一些心理语言学工作中（并在 Fodor & Inoue, 1994 的诊断模型和 Lewis, 1993 的 NL-Soar 模型中明确出现），但修复解析器的一般类别还没有明确的表述。本章朝着这样的表述迈出了第一步，展示了修复解析如何比其他重分析替代方案提供显着的计算优势，并提出了一种特殊的修复机制，snip，它解释了广泛的跨语言重分析现象。 Snip 是一个简单、自动、在线修复过程的建议。本章最后简要描述了如何将 snip 嵌入到更全面的句子处理架构中，该架构保持了 Pritchett（1992）等纯粹句法理论的结构敏感性，但仍然考虑了交互式研究所揭示的解析的灵活性。
This chapter develops a theory of reanalysis called limited repair parsing. Repair parsers deal with the problem of local ambiguity in part by modifying previously built structure when the chosen structure later proves to be inconsistent. This modification of existing structure distinguishes repair parsing from parallel or multi-path parsing, least-commitment parsing, backtracking, or reparsing strategies. Parsers with a limited capability for repair are psycholinguistically important because they can potentially explain the contrasts between difficult garden path structures (when repair fails) and unproblematic local ambiguities (when repair is successful or easy). Although the idea of repair has been implicit in some psycholinguistic work (and emerged explicitly in the diagnosis model of Fodor & Inoue, 1994, and the NL-Soar model of Lewis, 1993), there has been no clear formulation of the general class of repair parsers. This chapter makes a first step toward such a formulation, shows how repair parsing offers significant computational advantages over other alternatives for reanalysis, and proposes a particular repair mechanism, snip, that explains a wide range of cross-linguistic reanalysis phenomena. Snip is a proposal for a simple, automatic, on-line repair process. The chapter concludes by briefly describing how snip can be embedded in a more comprehensive sentence processing architecture that maintains the structural sensitivity of purely syntactic theories like Pritchett’s (1992), yet still accounts for the flexibility of parsing as revealed by interactive studies.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
人类的学习和记忆。
影响因子：
24.8
作者：
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者：
Hasher,L
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.555
发表时间：
1990-07-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
FERREIRA, F;HENDERSON, JM
通讯作者：
HENDERSON, JM