Targeting choline phospholipid metabolism: GDPD5 and GDPD6 silencing decrease breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
Targeting choline phospholipid metabolism: GDPD5 and GDPD6 silencing decrease breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/nbm.3573
复制
发表时间:
2016-08
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Glunde K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cao MD;Cheng M;Rizwan A;Jiang L;Krishnamachary B;Bhujwalla ZM;Bathen TF;Glunde K
Abnormal choline phospholipid metabolism is associated with oncogenesis and tumor progression. We have investigated the effects of targeting choline phospholipid metabolism by silencing two glycerophosphodiesterase genes, GDPD5 and GDPD6, using small interfering RNA (siRNA) in two breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. Treatment with GDPD5 and GDPD6 siRNA resulted in significant increases in glycerophosphocholine (GPC) levels, and no change in the levels of phosphocholine (PC) and free choline, which further supports their role as GPC specific regulators in breast cancer. The GPC levels were more than twofold increased during GDPD6 silencing, and marginally increased during GDPD5 silencing. DNA laddering was negative in both cell lines treated with GDPD5 and GDPD6 siRNA, indicating absence of apoptosis. Treatment with GDPD5 siRNA caused a decrease in cell proliferation in both breast cancer cell lines at 72h, while GDPD6 siRNA treatment decreased cell proliferation in MCF-7 at 72h, but not in MDA-MB-231 cells. Decreased cell migration and invasion were observed in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with GDPD5 or GDPD6 siRNA, where a more pronounced reduction in cell migration and invasion was observed under GDPD5 siRNA treatment as compared to GDPD6 siRNA treatment. In conclusion, GDPD6 silencing increased the GPC levels in breast cancer cells more profoundly than GDPD5 silencing, while the effects of GDPD5 silencing on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were more severe than those of GDPD6 silencing. Our results suggest that silencing GDPD5 and GDPD6 alone or in combination may have potential as new molecular targeting strategy for breast cancer treatment.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/53.3.661
发表时间:
1974-01-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
影响因子:
--
作者:
CAILLEAU, R;YOUNG, R;REEVES, WJ
通讯作者:
REEVES, WJ
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Cao MD;Giskeødegård GF;Bathen TF;Sitter B;Bofin A;Lønning PE;Lundgren S;Gribbestad IS
通讯作者:
Gribbestad IS
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Krishnamachary B;Glunde K;Wildes F;Mori N;Takagi T;Raman V;Bhujwalla ZM
通讯作者:
Bhujwalla ZM
DOI:
10.1038/nrc3162
发表时间:
2011-11-17
期刊:
Nature reviews. Cancer
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Cao, Maria D.;Sitter, Beathe;Gribbestad, Ingrid S.
通讯作者:
Gribbestad, Ingrid S.