Explaining Party Support in the 2016 Russian State Duma Election

Explaining Party Support in the 2016 Russian State Duma Election
复制标题

解释党在 2016 年俄罗斯国家杜马选举中的支持

DOI:
10.1163/2451-8921-00204004
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
0.8
通讯作者:
Hutcheson D
Hutcheson D
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hutcheson D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

由于最近俄罗斯选举的结果是可以预测的,选民往往被描述为选举过程中的被动行为者。然而,正如我们在这篇文章中所展示的,政治和社会因素仍然是人们投票行为的动机。本文分析了2016年国家杜马选举中的投票行为,使用选举后的全国代表性调查来评估四个议会政党支持基础之间的差异。研究发现,2016年大选的投票决定与选民对国家总统弗拉基米尔普京的态度以及他们对腐败和经济形势的态度密切相关。那些对总统持积极态度、对经济危机持善意态度的选民更有可能投票给“权力党”统一俄罗斯党。此外,这四个政党的选民有着独特的社会背景,与以往国家杜马选举中确立的长期模式相一致。
Because of the predicable outcomes of recent Russian elections, voters are often characterized as passive actors in the electoral process. However, as we show in this article, political and social factors still underpin the motivations for people’s voting behavior. The article analyzes voting behavior in the 2016 State Duma election, using a post-election, nationally representative survey to assess the differences between the four parliamentary parties’ support bases. It finds that voting decisions in the 2016 election were strongly related to voters’ attitudes to the national president, Vladimir Putin, as well as to their attitudes to corruption and the economic situation. Voters who were more positive to the president and viewed the economic crisis more benignly were more likely to vote for the ‘party of power’, United Russia. Moreover, the four parties’ electorates had distinctive social profiles that were consistent with long-term patterns established in previous State Duma elections.
没什么可看的——俄罗斯媒体中的归属感和可见度之争
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Lassila
通讯作者: J. Lassila
西欧以外的政党卡特尔
DOI: 10.1177/1354068811436033
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Party Politics
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Derek S. Hutcheson
通讯作者: Derek S. Hutcheson
分裂理论与后苏联俄罗斯的选举
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Y. Korgunyuk
通讯作者: Y. Korgunyuk
国际制裁对俄罗斯媒体经济的影响
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
I. Kiriya
通讯作者: I. Kiriya
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Oates
通讯作者: S. Oates