A Systematic Review of Arts-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People in Nature or Outdoor Spaces: Impact on Nature Connectedness, Health and Wellbeing.
A Systematic Review of Arts-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People in Nature or Outdoor Spaces: Impact on Nature Connectedness, Health and Wellbeing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858781
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Walshe N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moula Z;Palmer K;Walshe N
在过去30年里，儿童和年轻人在大自然和户外空间度过的时间大幅减少。COVID-19疫情后进一步下跌60%，令情况进一步恶化。研究表明，自然环境对健康和福祉有积极影响，导致基于自然的健康干预措施和绿色处方的处方，尽管其使用的证据主要限于成年人。越来越多的证据表明，艺术对健康和福祉的各个方面都有影响。然而，在文学中很少有人注意到艺术与自然之间的相互联系。本文综述了围绕艺术与自然之间的相互联系及其对儿童和青少年健康和福祉的影响的文献。系统检索了8个主要的电子数据库，手工检索包括20种期刊、6本书和与专家的联系。使用科克伦系统评价手册、PRISMA指南和TIDieR模板进行综述。所有阶段由两名研究人员独立进行，方案发表在PROSPERO上（注册号：CRD 42021286574）。虽然确定了9，314条记录，但只有11条记录被纳入，因为大多数研究都集中在艺术或自然上，而不是两者兼而有之。研究在英国、美国、爱尔兰、澳大利亚和香港进行，涉及森林、林地、海滩、公园、田野、花园和学校操场等一系列空间。该审查包括来自602名参与者的数据。自然中的艺术提供了一个包容性的媒介，让所有儿童和年轻人参与进来，特别是那些对环境问题不感兴趣、不参与教育项目的人。此外，自然中的艺术为增加自然连通性、了解环境问题和探索预防环境灾害的方法提供了刺激。这导致了更高的环境意识和亲环境行为，以及潜在的生态焦虑减少。虽然定性研究的质量很高，但定量研究的质量很低或不清楚，因此定量证据仍处于起步阶段。研究，政策和实践的影响进行了讨论，如方法和活动，以加强未来的干预措施。扩大现有的干预措施可能会导致更广泛的承认和纳入艺术的性质，在未来的健康指南，包括绿色处方。
The time that children and young people spend in nature and outdoor spaces has decreased significantly over the past 30 years. This was exacerbated with a further 60% decline post-COVID-19. Research demonstrating that natural environments have a positive impact on health and wellbeing has led to prescription of nature-based health interventions and green prescribing, although evidence for its use is predominantly limited to adults. Growing evidence also shows the impact of arts on all aspects of health and wellbeing. However, what has received scant attention in literature is the interconnection between the two: arts and nature. This review synthesizes the literature surrounding the interconnectedness between arts and nature, and their impact on the health and wellbeing of children and young people. Eight major electronic databases were systematically searched, while hand-searching included 20 journals, six books, and contact with experts. The review was conducted using the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews, PRISMA guidelines and TIDieR template. All stages were conducted independently by two researchers and the protocol was published on PROSPERO (Registration no.: CRD42021286574). Although 9,314 records were identified, only 11 records were included as most studies focused either on arts or nature, but not both. Studies were conducted in United Kingdom, United States, Ireland, Australia, and Hong Kong, in a range of spaces such as forests, woodlands, beaches, parks, fields, gardens, and school playgrounds. The review encompasses data from 602 participants in total. Arts-in-nature offered an inclusive medium to engage all children and young people, especially those who might otherwise remain disinterested about environmental issues and disengaged with educational programs. Further, arts-in-nature provided stimuli to increase nature connectivity, understand environmental issues and explore ways to prevent environmental disasters. This led to higher environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviors, and potential decrease in eco-anxiety. Although the quality of qualitative studies was high, the quality of quantitative studies was low or unclear, thus quantitative evidence is still at its infancy. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed, such as methods and activities to strengthen future interventions. Scaling-up existing interventions may lead to wider recognition and inclusion of arts-in-nature in future health guidelines, including green prescribing.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
COHEN, S;KAMARCK, T;MERMELSTEIN, R
通讯作者：
MERMELSTEIN, R
DOI：
10.1080/1364436x.2019.1646220
发表时间：
2019-08-22
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Adams, Dylan;Beauchamp, Gary
通讯作者：
Beauchamp, Gary
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Arbuthnott, Katherine D.;Sutter, Glenn C.
通讯作者：
Sutter, Glenn C.
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph110303453
发表时间：
2014-03-21
影响因子：
--
作者：
Beyer KM;Kaltenbach A;Szabo A;Bogar S;Nieto FJ;Malecki KM
通讯作者：
Malecki KM
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Chawla, Louise;Keena, Kelly;Stanley, Emily
通讯作者：
Stanley, Emily