“Mucosal maps” of the canine nasal cavity: Micro‐computed tomography and histology
“Mucosal maps” of the canine nasal cavity: Micro‐computed tomography and histology
复制标题
犬鼻腔的“粘膜图”:显微计算机断层扫描和组织学
DOI:
10.1002/ar.24511
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
DeLeon, Valerie B.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Smith, Timothy D.;Craven, Brent A.;Engel, Serena M.;Van Valkenburgh, Blaire;DeLeon, Valerie B.
Nasal turbinals, delicate and complex bones of the nasal cavity that support respiratory or olfactory mucosa (OM), are now easily studied using high resolution micro‐computed tomography (μ‐CT). Standard μ‐CT currently lacks the capacity to identify OM or other mucosa types without additional radio‐opaque staining techniques. However, even unstained mucosa is more radio‐opaque than air, and thus mucosal thickness can be discerned. Here, we assess mucosal thickness of the nasal fossa using the cranium of a cadaveric adult dog that was μ‐CT scanned with an isotropic resolution of 30 μm, and subsequently histologically sectioned and stained. After co‐alignment of μ‐CT slice planes to that of histology, mucosal thickness was estimated at four locations. Results based on either μ‐CT or histology indicate olfactory mucosa is thicker on average compared with non‐olfactory mucosa (non‐OM). In addition, olfactory mucosa has a lesser degree of variability than the non‐OM. Variability in the latter appears to relate mostly to the varying degree of vascularity of the lamina propria. Because of this, in structures with both specialized vascular respiratory mucosa and OM, such as the first ethmoturbinal (ET I), the range of thickness of OM and non‐OM may overlap. Future work should assess the utility of diffusible iodine‐based contrast enhanced CT techniques, which can differentiate epithelium from the lamina propria, to enhance our ability to differentiate mucosa types on more rostral ethmoturbinals. This is especially critical for structures such as ET I, which have mixed functional roles in many mammals.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
T. Rowe;Thomas P. Eiting;Thomas E. Macrini;R. Ketcham
通讯作者:
R. Ketcham
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
B. Van Valkenburgh;A. Curtis;J. Samuels;Deborah J. Bird;B. Fulkerson;J. Meachen;G. Slater
通讯作者:
G. Slater
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
T. Smith;B. Craven;Serena M Engel;C. Bonar;V. DeLeon
通讯作者:
V. DeLeon
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1989
期刊:
Journal of Physiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. A. Lung;J. C. Wang
通讯作者:
J. C. Wang
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
J. Dennis;S. Aono;V. Vodyanoy;E. Morrison
通讯作者:
E. Morrison