Understanding data quality: Instructional comprehension as a practical metric in crowdsourced investigations of behavioral economic cigarette demand.
Understanding data quality: Instructional comprehension as a practical metric in crowdsourced investigations of behavioral economic cigarette demand.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/pha0000579
复制
发表时间:
2022-08
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Bickel, Warren K.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Freitas-Lemos, Roberta;Tegge, Allison N.;Craft, William H.;Tomlinson, Devin C.;Stein, Jeffrey S.;Bickel, Warren K.
关键词:
Crowdsourcing platforms allow researchers to quickly recruit and collect behavioral economic measures in substance-using populations, such as cigarette smokers. Despite the broad utility and flexibility, data quality issues have been an object of concern. In two separate studies recruiting cigarette smokers, we sought to investigate the association between a practical quality control measure (accuracy on an instruction quiz), on internal consistency of number of cigarettes smoked per day and purchasing patterns of tobacco products in an Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM; Study 1), and in a Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT; Study 2). Participants (N=312 in Study 1; N=119 in Study 2) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Both studies included task instructions, a quiz, a purchase task, cigarette usage and dependence questions, and demographics. The results show that participants who answered all instruction items correctly: 1) reported the number of cigarettes per day more consistently (partial η2 = 0.11, p<0.001, Study 1; partial η2 = 0.09, p=0.016, Study 2) 2) demonstrated increased model fit among the cigarette demand curves (partial η2 = 0.23, p<0.001, Study 1; partial η2 = 0.08, p=0.002, Study 2), and purchased tobacco products in the ETM more consistently with their current usage. We conclude that instruction quizzes before purchase tasks may be useful for researchers evaluating demand data. Instruction quizzes with multiple items may allow researchers to choose the level of data quality appropriate for their studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
DeHart WB;Kaplan BA;Pope DA;Mellis AM;Bickel WK
通讯作者:
Bickel WK
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Chmielewski, Michael;Kucker, Sarah C.
通讯作者:
Kucker, Sarah C.
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Kennedy, Ryan;Clifford, Scott;Winter, Nicholas J. G.
通讯作者:
Winter, Nicholas J. G.
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Koffarnus, Mikhail N.;Franck, Christopher T.;Bickel, Warren K.
通讯作者:
Bickel, Warren K.
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
Brown, Jeremiah;Washington, Wendy Donlin;Kaplan, Brent A.
通讯作者:
Kaplan, Brent A.