The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval

The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval
复制标题

双记忆检索中学习并行性的特殊性

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
T. Rickard
T. Rickard
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tilo Strobach;T. Schubert;H. Pashler;T. Rickard

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

从一个视觉呈现的线索中提取两个反应,在双重提取练习开始时顺序发生。仅适用于采用分组模式的受试者(即,同步)它们的响应执行,然而,双重检索实践之后的反应时间指示向学习的检索并行性的转变(例如,Nino & Rickard,in Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,29,373-388,2003).在本研究中,我们调查了这种学习的并行性是如何实现的,为什么它似乎只发生在受试者谁组他们的反应。考虑了两个主要帐户:任务级帐户和提示级帐户。任务层面的帐户假设学习检索并行发生在任务作为一个整体的水平,并不限于实践的线索。因此,在实践之后,重复响应执行可以促进向并行检索的一般转变。线索水平帐户指出,学习检索并行是特定于实践的线索。这种类型的并行性可能是由于特定于提示的响应分块,这种分块是由于分组的响应执行而唯一发生的。两个实验的结果有利于第二个帐户,最好的解释在结构瓶颈模型。
Retrieval of two responses from one visually presented cue occurs sequentially at the outset of dual-retrieval practice. Exclusively for subjects who adopt a mode of grouping (i.e., synchronizing) their response execution, however, reaction times after dual-retrieval practice indicate a shift to learned retrieval parallelism (e.g., Nino & Rickard, in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 373–388, 2003). In the present study, we investigated how this learned parallelism is achieved and why it appears to occur only for subjects who group their responses. Two main accounts were considered: a task-level versus a cue-level account. The task-level account assumes that learned retrieval parallelism occurs at the level of the task as a whole and is not limited to practiced cues. Grouping response execution may thus promote a general shift to parallel retrieval following practice. The cue-level account states that learned retrieval parallelism is specific to practiced cues. This type of parallelism may result from cue-specific response chunking that occurs uniquely as a consequence of grouped response execution. The results of two experiments favored the second account and were best interpreted in terms of a structural bottleneck model.
认知技能学习中的策略执行:候选模型的项目级测试。
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.65
发表时间: 2004
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
影响因子: --
作者:
Rickard,TimothyC
通讯作者: Rickard,TimothyC
对单个物体做出两种反应:对中央注意力瓶颈的影响。
DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1058
发表时间: 1992
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
影响因子: --
作者:
Fagot,C;Pashler,H
通讯作者: Pashler,H
练习从单个提示中提取两次记忆的效果。
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.373
发表时间: 2003
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Nino,RandallS;Rickard,TimothyC
通讯作者: Rickard,TimothyC
给定两个独立线索的记忆检索:线索选择还是并行访问?
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.07.002
发表时间: 2004
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Rickard,TimothyC;Bajic,Daniel
通讯作者: Bajic,Daniel
认知技能学习:策略转变和组件操作速度与年龄相关的差异。
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.565
发表时间: 2004
期刊: Psychology and aging.
影响因子: --
作者:
Touron,DaynaR;Hoyer,WilliamJ;Cerella,John
通讯作者: Cerella,John