Different temporal windows for contextual fear memory destabilisation in the amygdala and hippocampus
Different temporal windows for contextual fear memory destabilisation in the amygdala and hippocampus
复制标题
杏仁核和海马体情境恐惧记忆不稳定的不同时间窗口
DOI:
10.1101/434407
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lee J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lee J
Reconsolidation is a process in which re-exposure to a reminder causes a previously acquired memory to undergo a process of destabilisation followed by subsequent restabilisation. Different molecular mechanisms have been postulated for destabilisation in the amygdala and hippocampus, including CB1 receptor activation, protein degradation and AMPA receptor exchange; however, most of the amygdala studies have used pre-re-exposure interventions, while those in the hippocampus have performed them after re-exposure. To test whether the temporal window for destabilisation is similar across both structures, we trained Lister Hooded rats in a contextual fear conditioning task, and 1 day later performed memory re-exposure followed by injection of either the NMDA antagonist MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) or saline in order to block reconsolidation. In parallel, we also performed local injections of either the CB1 antagonist SR141716A or its vehicle in the hippocampus or in the amygdala, either immediately before or immediately after reactivation. Infusion of SR141716A in the hippocampus prevented the reconsolidation-blocking effect of MK-801 when performed after re-exposure, but not before it. In the amygdala, meanwhile, pre-reexposure infusions of SR141716A impaired reconsolidation blockade by MK-801, although the time-dependency of this effect was not as clear as in the hippocampus. Our results suggest the temporal windows for CB1-receptor-mediated memory destabilisation during reconsolidation vary between brain structures. Whether this reflects different time windows for engagement of these structures or different roles played by CB1 receptors in destabilisation across structures remains an open question for future studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Nader, K;Schafe, GE;Le Doux, JE
通讯作者:
Le Doux, JE
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Pertwee
通讯作者:
R. Pertwee
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Barbara K. A. Onishi;G. Xavier
通讯作者:
G. Xavier
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Carlos J. Rodriguez;F. Bermúdez
通讯作者:
F. Bermúdez
影响因子:
25
作者:
Ben Mamou, Cyrinne;Gamache, Karine;Nader, Karim
通讯作者:
Nader, Karim