Differential association between affect and somatic symptoms at the between‐ and within‐individual level

Differential association between affect and somatic symptoms at the between‐ and within‐individual level
复制标题

个体之间和个体内部水平上情感和躯体症状之间的差异关联

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
7.9
通讯作者:
J. Rosmalen
J. Rosmalen
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. M. Schenk;E. Bos;J. Slaets;P. de Jonge;J. Rosmalen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

OBJECTIVES The established between-subjects associations between affect and somatic symptoms have often been interpreted as indicating a causal effect of affect on somatic symptoms, but it is doubtful whether this is valid. In this study, we evaluate the association between positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and somatic symptoms at both the between- and within-subject level. DESIGN AND METHODS Diary data were collected in the context of an online study called 'HowNutsAreTheDutch'. Participants filled out an online questionnaire, three times a day for 30 consecutive days. A mixed linear model was used to test the contemporaneous and lagged associations between affect and somatic symptoms. RESULTS Five hundred and eighty-six participants (481 females, median age 39.6 years [range 18.1-71.4]) were included with a total number of 28,264 completed questionnaires. At the between-subjects level, a positive association between NA and somatic symptoms was found (B = .60, p < .001), whereas the negative association between PA and somatic symptoms was much smaller (B = -.14, p = .062). At the within-subject level, PA (B = -.33, p < .001) was more strongly associated with somatic symptoms than NA (B = .13, p < .001). The lagged analyses showed a negative association between previous-day PA and somatic symptoms (B = -.05, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that NA is more important for differences in symptom levels between subjects, whereas PA is more important for variations in symptom levels within subjects. Moreover, our results suggest that an increase in PA is followed by a decrease in somatic symptoms after 24 hr, which suggests a causal effect. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Affect and somatic processes are closely linked. Cross-sectional studies show, for example, that people with higher levels of negative affect tend to report more somatic symptoms. Findings between individuals, though, might camouflage processes at within-individual level, and it might not always be possible to translate findings at the population level to the individual. However, diary studies are upcoming and show more about processes on individual level. What does this study add? Highlights the difference between processes at the within-individual and the between-individual level. Shows the importance of positive affect at individual level in relation to somatic symptoms. Shows the benefits of the use of new techniques in diary studies.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.296
发表时间: 1988-02-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
CLARK, LA;WATSON, D
通讯作者: WATSON, D
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.001
发表时间: 2016-09
期刊: JOURNAL OF PAIN
影响因子: 4
作者:
Edwards, Robert R.;Dworkin, Robert H.;Sullivan, Mark D.;Turk, Dennis C.;Wasan, Ajay D.
通讯作者: Wasan, Ajay D.
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199910283411801
发表时间: 1999-10-28
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Simon, GE;VonKorff, M;Ormel, J
通讯作者: Ormel, J
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Curran PJ;Bauer DJ
通讯作者: Bauer DJ