Switching of dominant retrotransposon silencing strategies from posttranscriptional to transcriptional mechanisms during male germ-cell development in mice.
Switching of dominant retrotransposon silencing strategies from posttranscriptional to transcriptional mechanisms during male germ-cell development in mice.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1006926
复制
发表时间:
2017-07
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Sasaki H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Inoue K;Ichiyanagi K;Fukuda K;Glinka M;Sasaki H
Mammalian genomes harbor millions of retrotransposon copies, some of which are transpositionally active. In mouse prospermatogonia, PIWI-interacting small RNAs (piRNAs) combat retrotransposon activity to maintain the genomic integrity. The piRNA system destroys retrotransposon-derived RNAs and guides de novo DNA methylation at some retrotransposon promoters. However, it remains unclear whether DNA methylation contributes to retrotransposon silencing in prospermatogonia. We have performed comprehensive studies of DNA methylation and polyA(+) RNAs (transcriptome) in developing male germ cells from Pld6/Mitopld and Dnmt3l knockout mice, which are defective in piRNA biogenesis and de novo DNA methylation, respectively. The Dnmt3l mutation greatly reduced DNA methylation levels at most retrotransposons, but its impact on their RNA abundance was limited in prospermatogonia. In Pld6 mutant germ cells, although only a few retrotransposons exhibited reduced DNA methylation, many showed increased expression at the RNA level. More detailed analysis of RNA sequencing, nascent RNA quantification, profiling of cleaved RNA ends, and the results obtained from double knockout mice suggest that PLD6 works mainly at the posttranscriptional level. The increase in retrotransposon expression was larger in Pld6 mutants than it was in Dnmt3l mutants, suggesting that RNA degradation by the piRNA system plays a more important role than does DNA methylation in prospermatogonia. However, DNA methylation had a long-term effect: hypomethylation caused by the Pld6 or Dnmt3l mutation resulted in increased retrotransposon expression in meiotic spermatocytes. Thus, posttranscriptional silencing plays an important role in the early stage of germ cell development, then transcriptional silencing becomes important in later stages. In addition, intergenic and intronic retrotransposon sequences, in particular those containing the antisense L1 promoters, drove ectopic expression of nearby genes in both mutant spermatocytes, suggesting that retrotransposon silencing is important for the maintenance of not only genomic integrity but also transcriptomic integrity. Retrotransposons are a class of transposable elements, of which mobility has mutagenic potential. Therefore, it is important to regulate the expression of retrotransposons for maintaining the genomic integrity. In male germ cells, DNA methylation and the piRNA system are thought to play roles in retrotransposon silencing. However, genome-wide DNA methylation is once erased (in primordial germ cells) and reestablished (in prospermatogonia) during development. In prospermatogonia, piRNAs guide de novo DNA methylation at some retrotransposons. To clarify the contribution of DNA methylation and the piRNA system to retrotransposon silencing in the course of male germ cell development, we analyzed DNA methylation and RNA expression in Dnmt3l and Pld6 knockout mice, which are defective in de novo DNA methylation and piRNA biogenesis, respectively. Our results reveal that, in prospermatogonia, the piRNA system works mainly at the posttranscriptional level, and plays a more important role than does DNA methylation in retrotransposon silencing. However, DNA methylation becomes much more important in later stages when germ cells enter meiosis (in spermatocytes). We also found that hypomethylated retrotransposons can drive ectopic expression of nearby genes; therefore, their transcriptional silencing by DNA methylation is important for maintaining the transcriptomic integrity as well.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
Goh WS;Falciatori I;Tam OH;Burgess R;Meikar O;Kotaja N;Hammell M;Hannon GJ
通讯作者:
Hannon GJ
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Jurka, J;Kapitonov, VV;Walichiewicz, J
通讯作者:
Walichiewicz, J
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Ichiyanagi T;Ichiyanagi K;Ogawa A;Kuramochi-Miyagawa S;Nakano T;Chuma S;Sasaki H;Udono H
通讯作者:
Udono H
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Kato, Yuzuru;Kaneda, Masahiro;Sasaki, Hiroyuki
通讯作者:
Sasaki, Hiroyuki
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Jiang, Hui;Wong, Wing Hung
通讯作者:
Wong, Wing Hung