Navigating Family Involvement in Domestic Violence Fatality Review: Conceptualising Prospects for Systems and Relational Repair
Navigating Family Involvement in Domestic Violence Fatality Review: Conceptualising Prospects for Systems and Relational Repair
复制标题
引导家庭参与家庭暴力死亡审查：构想系统和关系修复的前景
DOI：
10.1007/s10896-021-00309-x
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Rowlands J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rowlands J
目的家庭参与是家庭凶杀审查（DHR）的一个关键要素，这是在英格兰和威尔士发现的家庭暴力死亡审查（DVFR）的形式。家庭参与被认为具有双重目的：首先，它有利于人权报告，使人们能够更全面地了解受害者的经历；第二，对家庭本身有利，特别是作为治疗或宣泄的机会。然而，这些双重目的很少被考虑。这篇概念性文章通过质疑家庭参与的目的、过程和结果来回应这种缺失。方法综合政策、实践和现有的与家庭参与dhr相关的实证和理论文献，阐明目的、过程和结果。我们通过与其他审查系统中有关家庭参与的更广泛的新兴研究机构合作来补充这一点，并从公民身份和参与的角度进行分析。结果家庭参与dhr的情况很少得到说明，需要更好地了解家庭如何参与dhr，作为提高家庭权利透明度的一种方式。作为回应，提出了一个暂定的概念框架，将家庭参与作为系统和关系修复的示范。文章的结论是，我们应该更多地关注支持家庭地位及其证词的变革理论，以及整个DHR系统。这种明确性将有利于家庭，因为家庭既是专业互动的主体，但重要的是，家庭本身也是人权报告进程的代理人。
PurposeFamily involvement is a key element of Domestic Homicide Review (DHR), the form of Domestic Violence Fatality Review (DVFR) found in England and Wales. Family involvement is framed as having dual purposes: first, as a benefit to DHRs, enabling a fuller picture of victims’ experiences; second, as a benefit to families themselves, notably as a therapeutic or cathartic opportunity. However, these dual purposes have been little considered. This conceptual article responds to this absence by interrogating the purpose, process and outcomes of family involvement within DHRs.MethodTo explicate purpose, process and outcomes, we synthesise policy, practice and the extant empirical and theoretical literature relating to family involvement in DHRs. We supplement this by engaging with a broader body of emerging research on family involvement in other review systems, analysing this through a lens of citizenship and participation.ResultsFamily involvement in DHRs is little explicated and there is a need to better engage with how family are involved in DHRs, as a way of increasing transparency for family rights. By way of response, a tentative conceptual framework is proposed which situates family involvement as demonstrative of systems- and relational-repair.ConclusionsThe article concludes by arguing for greater attention to the Theory(s) of Change underpinning both the place of the family and their testimony, as well as the DHR system as a whole. Such clarity would benefit family, both as the subject of professional interactions but, critically, as agents in the DHR process in their own right.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
影响因子：
--
作者：
L. Bugeja;M. Dawson;Sara;Carolyn Walsh
通讯作者：
Carolyn Walsh
“当没有人允许你表达自己的声音时，你如何让别人听到你的声音？” 工作中的受害者
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Katherine Snell;S. Tombs
通讯作者：
S. Tombs
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
Political quarterly (London. 1930. Print)
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Ryan
通讯作者：
S. Ryan
社区、公民参与和民主：家庭暴力死亡案例审查
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Neil S. Websdale
通讯作者：
Neil S. Websdale
家庭暴力死亡回顾：最新技术
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_133-1
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Handbook of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse Across the Lifespan
影响因子：
--
作者：
Neil S. Websdale
通讯作者：
Neil S. Websdale