Comparing categorization models.
Comparing categorization models.
复制标题
比较分类模型。
DOI:
10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.63
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ratcliff,Roger
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rouder,JeffreyN;Ratcliff,Roger
Four experiments are presented that competitively test rule-and exemplar-based models of human categorization behavior. Participants classified stimuli that varied on a unidimensional axis into 2 categories. The stimuli did not consistently belong to a category; instead, they were probabilistically assigned. By manipulating these assignment probabilities, it was possible to produce stimuli for which exemplar-and rule-based explanations made qualitatively different predictions. FG Ashby and JT Townsend's (1986) rule-based general recognition theory provided a better account of the data than RM Nosofsky's (1986) exemplar-based generalized context model in conditions in which the to-be-classified stimuli were relatively confusable. However, generalized context model provided a better account when the stimuli were relatively few and distinct. These findings are consistent with multiple process accounts of categorization and demonstrate that stimulus confusion is a determining factor as 10 which process mediates categorization.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
F. Ashby;Wolfgang Schwarz;J. D. Balakrishnan;W. K. Estes;J. Falmagne;Todd Maddox;R. Ratcliff;Elliot;Gregory Ashby
通讯作者:
Gregory Ashby
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1968
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Trabasso;G. Bower;R. Gelman
通讯作者:
R. Gelman
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
E. B. Hartman
通讯作者:
E. B. Hartman
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Poldrack, RA;Prabhakaran, V;Gabrieli, JDE
通讯作者:
Gabrieli, JDE
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. S. Stevens;J. Wixted
通讯作者:
J. Wixted