New structures of power and regulation within ‘distributed’ education policy – the example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative

New structures of power and regulation within ‘distributed’ education policy – the example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative
复制标题

“分布式”教育政策中的新权力和监管结构——美国共同核心国家标准倡议的例子

DOI:
10.1080/02680939.2015.1103903
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Sigrid
Sigrid
中科院分区:
教育学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hartong;Sigrid

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文着重于不断发展的新形式的“分布式”治理在当前大规模的教育改革。重点是所谓的“通过标准进行治理”,作为一种变革性的改革综合体,它表现为监管不稳定和政策控制(全球)重建的同时过程。这种新出现的监管政策“合奏”被认为是直接关系到日益增长的跨领域网络之间的合作活动的政府,非政府和私人行为者。从经验上讲,本文提到了自2001年以来从根本上重塑美国教育政策的所谓共同核心国家标准(CCSS)倡议。该倡议包括谈判、实施和控制K-12教育的超国家核心技能标准,作为评估、监测和教师培训等其他监管工具的基准。在哥斯达黎加社会保障机构的框架内,上述新的监管结构可以置于围绕非营利组织Achieve公司的企业联盟内。通过其作为核心政策网络管理者的职能,Achieve产生了合作与区分、话语发起和(无形的)规范稳定的同时实践。
This article focuses on the growing development towards new forms of ‘distributed’ governance within current large-scale educational reforms. The emphasis is on so-called ‘governance through standards’ as a transformative reform complex which manifests itself in a simultaneous process of regulative destabilisation and (global) reconstruction of policy control. This newly emerging regulative policy ‘ensemble’ is found to be directly related to the growing collaborative activity of cross-field networks between governmental, non-governmental and private actors. Empirically, this article refers to the so-calledCommon Core State Standards(CCSS) Initiative which has fundamentally reshaped US education policy since 2001. The initiative comprised the negotiation, implementation and controlling of supra-state core skill standards for K-12 education as the benchmark for other regulating instruments such as assessments, monitoring and teacher training. In the context of the CCSS, the aforementioned new structures of regulation can then be located within an entrepreneurial alliance around the non-profit organisation Achieve, Inc. Through its function as a core policy network manager, Achieve generated simultaneous practices of collaboration and distinction, discourse initiation and (invisible) norm stabilisation.
从处于危险之中的国家到不让一个孩子掉队:国家教育目标和联邦教育政策的制定
DOI: 10.5860/choice.47-5165
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
M. Vinovskis
通讯作者: M. Vinovskis
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-80554-6_8
发表时间: 2004
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Thomas Brüsemeister
通讯作者: Thomas Brüsemeister
盖茨基金会与美国公立学校的未来
DOI: 10.4324/9780203834947
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Philip E. Kovacs
通讯作者: Philip E. Kovacs
DOI: 10.1177/0895904812465119
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Educational Policy
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
L. Mcdonnell
通讯作者: L. Mcdonnell
有组织的利益和共同核心
DOI: 10.3102/0013189x13512676
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
L. Mcdonnell;M. Weatherford
通讯作者: M. Weatherford