The roots of change: Cultivating equity and change across generations from healthy roots.
The roots of change: Cultivating equity and change across generations from healthy roots.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/plcell/koac121
复制
发表时间:
2022-07-04
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dear Editor, Recent and ongoing challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and reengagement with the pervasive issue of systemic racism in society and scientific communities have presented opportunities for many to reflect on their internal structures and practices related to equity. In the wake of these opportunities for reflection and action, many professional organizations and academic entities have issued collective public statements and commitments to climate assessment, cultural change, and structural transformation. For example, the American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB) and ASPB leadership made public assurances to address issues of inequity and promises to dismantle organizational practices and structures that reify systemic biases and oppression (Callis et al., 2020). Advancing these commitments has not been without challenges, including the resistance that arises from challenging traditional practices, measures of success, and interpersonal negotiations that underlie lived commitments to change and the pursuit of equity. Commitments made by disciplinary societies are important, as these organizations have critical responsibilities to address bias and racism in STEM for the benefit of all of their members. These societies play active roles in modeling lived commitments to equity, which include directly engaging with difficult topics related to systemic exclusion and bias and promoting culturally aware engagement of scientists in societal activities (Montgomery, 2016, 2020a, 2020c; Montgomery and Col on-Carmona, 2016). Indeed, although 2020 spurred new conversations and questions about ongoing assurances, many disciplinary societies and other organizations already had nominal obligations and established mechanisms and structures with expressed commitments to equity, such as established diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committees (Madzima and MacIntosh, 2021), mission statements, and strategic DEI goals. A practical response to the heightened attention to systemic racism and bias in 2020 might have been to query why existing structures and commitments had not served to address long-standing issues effectively. Instead, many organizations proposed new structures—often associated with new availability of funds—or, alternatively, added new layers to existing structures without adequate assessment of current structures and practices.Following broad-ranging organizational statements and expressed commitments, financial commitments and funding opportunities emerged to support organizational efforts and interventions. For scientific communities, both the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced major efforts to dismantle systemic racism and its negative impacts in STEM environments. The NIH established the UNITE initiative, whose purpose is “to identify and address structural racism within the NIH-supported and the greater scientific community”(https://www. nih. gov/ending-structural-racism/unite). The UNITE effort identifies five foci represented in its acronym: U, understanding stakeholder experiences; N, new research on health disparities and related health equity issues; I, improving the NIH culture; T, transparency, communication, and accountability; and E, extramural research ecosystem. The NIH also initiated the Faculty Institutional Recruitment for Sustainable Transformation (FIRST) program, which aims “to increase the representation of faculty from underrepresented groups in biomedical science” by supporting institutions in hiring cohorts of early-career faculty from diverse
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0704591104
发表时间:
2007-07-03
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Li, Long;Li, Shu-Min;Zhang, Fu-Suo
通讯作者:
Zhang, Fu-Suo
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
CUSHMAN, JH
通讯作者:
CUSHMAN, JH
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Gao, SY;Pan, WL;Koenig, RT
通讯作者:
Koenig, RT
影响因子:
9.4
作者:
Estrada M;Eroy-Reveles A;Matsui J
通讯作者:
Matsui J
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Isbell, Forest;Craven, Dylan;Eisenhauer, Nico
通讯作者:
Eisenhauer, Nico