Crowdsourcing Similarity Judgments for Agreement Analysis in End-User Elicitation Studies
Crowdsourcing Similarity Judgments for Agreement Analysis in End-User Elicitation Studies
复制标题
最终用户启发研究中协议分析的众包相似性判断
DOI:
10.1145/3242587.3242621
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Wobbrock, Jacob O.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ali, Abdullah X.;Morris, Meredith Ringel;Wobbrock, Jacob O.
End-user elicitation studies are a popular design method, but their data require substantial time and effort to analyze. In this paper, we present Crowdsensus, a crowd-powered tool that enables researchers to efficiently analyze the results of elicitation studies using subjective human judgment and automatic clustering algorithms. In addition to our own analysis, we asked six expert researchers with experience running and analyzing elicitation studies to analyze an end-user elicitation dataset of 10 functions for operating a web-browser, each with 43 voice commands elicited from end-users for a total of 430 voice commands. We used Crowdsensus to gather similarity judgments of these same 430 commands from 410 online crowd workers. The crowd outperformed the experts by arriving at the same results for seven of eight functions and resolving a function where the experts failed to agree. Also, using Crowdsensus was about four times faster than using experts.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Interacción
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wen;Kai;Hao Li;Hu Zhou
通讯作者:
Hu Zhou
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011-05
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Omer Tamuz;Ce Liu;Serge J. Belongie;Ohad Shamir;A. Kalai
通讯作者:
Omer Tamuz;Ce Liu;Serge J. Belongie;Ohad Shamir;A. Kalai
影响因子:
22.7
作者:
M. S. Silberman;Bill Tomlinson;R. LaPlante;J. Ross;L. Irani;Andrew Zaldivar
通讯作者:
Andrew Zaldivar
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1984
期刊:
CACM
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Good;J. Whiteside;Dennis R. Wixon;Sandra J. Jones
通讯作者:
Sandra J. Jones
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Zhenya Zhang;Hongmei Cheng;Wanli Chen;Shuguan Zhang;Qiansheng Fang
通讯作者:
Qiansheng Fang