A rapid review of measures to support people in isolation or quarantine during the Covid-19 pandemic and the effectiveness of such measures.
A rapid review of measures to support people in isolation or quarantine during the Covid-19 pandemic and the effectiveness of such measures.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/rmv.2244
复制
发表时间：
2022-01
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
O'Neill M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cardwell K;O'Neill SM;Tyner B;Broderick N;O'Brien K;Smith SM;Harrington P;Ryan M;O'Neill M
这项快速审查旨在确定可采取的措施，以支持那些在2019年冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间被隔离或隔离的人，并确定其在改善对这些建议的遵守和或减少传播方面的有效性。快速审查包括两个部分，首先是审查国家和国际机构发布的指导意见，这些指导意见涉及在新冠肺炎大流行期间支持那些处于隔离状态(由于病例状态)或隔离(由于密切接触状态)的人的措施。国际指导意见确定了五类支持措施，它们是：心理、成瘾和安全支持、基本用品、财政援助、信息提供和执行。第二个要素是对在任何大流行或流行环境中支持因呼吸道病原体而被隔离或隔离的个人的措施的有效性进行快速文献审查。从2000年1月1日至2021年1月26日，对发表的同行评审的文章和非同行评审的预印本进行了系统的检索。两份澳大利亚出版物符合纳入标准，均基于2009年H1N1流感大流行期间进行的一项调查数据。第一份报告称，55%的家庭完全遵守了隔离建议，与那些报告不了解他们应该做什么的家庭相比，了解他们应该做什么的家庭报告的遵从性增加(优势比[OR]：2.27，95%可信区间[CI]：1.35-3.80)。第二项研究报告说，获得带薪病假和/或护理假并不能预测是否遵守隔离建议(OR：2.07，95%CI：0.82-5.23)。两人都没有报告传播减少的情况。
This rapid review aimed to identify measures available to support those in isolation or quarantine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid‐19) pandemic, and determine their effectiveness in improving adherence to these recommendations and or reducing transmission. The rapid review consisted of two elements, the first was a review of guidance published by national and international agencies relating to measures to support those in isolation (due to case status) or quarantine (due to close contact status) during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Five categories of support measures were identified in the international guidance, they were: Psychological, addiction and safety supports, Essential supplies, Financial aid, Information provision and Enforcement. The second element was a rapid literature review of the effectiveness of measures used to support individuals in isolation or quarantine during any pandemic or epidemic setting, due to respiratory pathogens. A systematic search of published peer‐reviewed articles and nonpeer‐reviewed pre‐prints was undertaken from 1 January 2000 to 26 January 2021. Two Australian publications met the inclusion criteria, both based on data from a survey undertaken during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. The first reported that 55% of households were fully compliant with quarantine recommendations, and that there was increased compliance reported in households that understood what they were meant to do compared with those who reported that they did not (odds ratio [OR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–3.80). The second reported that access to paid sick and or carer's leave did not predict compliance with quarantine recommendations (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.82–5.23). Neither reported on reduction in transmission.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Lunn, Peter D.;Timmons, Shane;McGowan, Feidhlim P.
通讯作者：
McGowan, Feidhlim P.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Kavanagh AM;Bentley RJ;Mason KE;McVernon J;Petrony S;Fielding J;LaMontagne AD;Studdert DM
通讯作者：
Studdert DM
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Seale, Holly;Dyer, Clare E. F.;Islam, M. Saiful
通讯作者：
Islam, M. Saiful
影响因子：
29.9
作者：
Van Bavel, Jay J.;Baicker, Katherine;Willer, Robb
通讯作者：
Willer, Robb
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Garritty C;Gartlehner G;Nussbaumer-Streit B;King VJ;Hamel C;Kamel C;Affengruber L;Stevens A
通讯作者：
Stevens A