The neural correlates of texture perception: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
The neural correlates of texture perception: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/brb3.3264
复制
发表时间：
2023-11
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Fallon, Nicholas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Henderson, Jessica;Mari, Tyler;Hewitt, Danielle;Newton-Fenner, Alice;Giesbrecht, Timo;Marshall, Alan;Stancak, Andrej;Fallon, Nicholas
关键词：
人类通过与表面的动态相互作用使用辨别性触摸来感知纹理，激活皮肤中的低阈值机械感受器。人们在很大程度上认为，纹理是在大脑中的初级躯体感觉区域进行处理的;然而，成像研究表明，与纹理处理相关的大脑活动的异质模式。为了解决这一问题，我们对系统性综述选择的13项功能性磁共振成像研究（包括15项实验，共有228名参与者和275个病灶）进行了基于坐标的激活可能性估计Meta分析。一致的激活纹理知觉发生在左侧的主要躯体感觉和运动区域，与双边激活的次级躯体感觉，后额叶，运动前和补充运动皮层。我们还评估了比较触摸处理与非触觉控制的研究之间的差异（例如，休息或视觉控制）或使用触觉控制的那些（例如，形状或方向感知）来专门研究纹理编码。采用触觉控制的研究显示，只有在左侧次级躯体感觉皮层的纹理处理的一致性。对比分析表明，与考虑其他触觉方面的实验相比，非触觉控制研究的左侧初级体感区和顶叶下皮层激活的一致性更高。这些结果表明，纹理加工可能会招募更高级的整合结构，和次级躯体感觉皮层可能在编码纹理属性中发挥关键作用。本研究通过评估非纹理触觉元素的影响，为纹理相关处理的神经相关性提供了独特的见解，并为未来的研究设计确定了了解纹理神经处理的机会。我们的综述通过研究纹理处理与非触觉和触觉基线相比，为理解大脑中的纹理感知提供了独特的见解。激活可能性估计表明初级和高阶感觉运动区域的纹理处理一致激活。此外，对比分析表明，纹理加工优先招募高阶整合结构。
Humans use discriminative touch to perceive texture through dynamic interactions with surfaces, activating low‐threshold mechanoreceptors in the skin. It was largely assumed that texture was processed in primary somatosensory regions in the brain; however, imaging studies indicate heterogeneous patterns of brain activity associated with texture processing. To address this, we conducted a coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of 13 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (comprising 15 experiments contributing 228 participants and 275 foci) selected by a systematic review. Concordant activations for texture perception occurred in the left primary somatosensory and motor regions, with bilateral activations in the secondary somatosensory, posterior insula, and premotor and supplementary motor cortices. We also evaluated differences between studies that compared touch processing to non‐haptic control (e.g., rest or visual control) or those that used haptic control (e.g., shape or orientation perception) to specifically investigate texture encoding. Studies employing a haptic control revealed concordance for texture processing only in the left secondary somatosensory cortex. Contrast analyses demonstrated greater concordance of activations in the left primary somatosensory regions and inferior parietal cortex for studies with a non‐haptic control, compared to experiments accounting for other haptic aspects. These findings suggest that texture processing may recruit higher order integrative structures, and the secondary somatosensory cortex may play a key role in encoding textural properties. The present study provides unique insight into the neural correlates of texture‐related processing by assessing the influence of non‐textural haptic elements and identifies opportunities for a future research design to understand the neural processing of texture. Our review provides unique insight into the understanding of texture perception in the brain by investigating texture processing compared to non‐haptic and haptic baselines. Activation likelihood estimation demonstrated concordant activation for texture processing in primary and high‐order sensorimotor regions. Further, contrast analysis suggested texture processing preferentially recruits high‐order integrative structures.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1093/cercor/bhq186
发表时间：
2011-07
期刊：
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Deen B;Pitskel NB;Pelphrey KA
通讯作者：
Pelphrey KA
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Vingerhoets G;Nys J;Honoré P;Vandekerckhove E;Vandemaele P
通讯作者：
Vandemaele P
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Eickhoff, Simon B.;Grefkes, Christian;Fink, Gereon R.
通讯作者：
Fink, Gereon R.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Acar, Freya;Seurinck, Ruth;Moerkerke, Beatrijs
通讯作者：
Moerkerke, Beatrijs
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
DETTMERS, C;FINK, GR;FRACKOWIAK, RSJ
通讯作者：
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ