The philosopher in the scanner (or: how can neuroscience contribute to social philosophy?)

The philosopher in the scanner (or: how can neuroscience contribute to social philosophy?)
复制标题

扫描仪中的哲学家(或者:神经科学如何为社会哲学做出贡献?)

DOI:
10.1080/13501781003756527
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Guala F
Guala F
中科院分区:
经济学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guala F

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

分析哲学受到了实验方法的挑战,这些实验方法利用了认知科学方法等。在这篇文章中,我们用一个社会科学基础研究的例子来说明将哲学与神经科学相结合的好处。我们认为,与被动依赖神经科学家的数据相比,设计新颖的实验来回答特定的哲学问题有几个优势。在这种特殊的情况下,数据将注意力重新引导到主流社会神经科学相对忽视的主题上,例如归纳推理。
Analytical philosophy has been challenged by experimental approaches that make use of, among other things, cognitive science methods. In this paper we illustrate the benefits of merging philosophy with neuroscience, using an example of research in the foundations of social science. We argue that designing novel experiments to answer specific philosophical questions has several advantages compared to relying passively on neuroscientists’ data. In this particular case, the data redirect attention towards topics – such as inductive reasoning – that are relatively overlooked by mainstream social neuroscience.
DOI: 10.2307/3505086
发表时间: 1998
期刊: Law and Philosophy
影响因子: 0.8
作者:
R. Sugden
通讯作者: R. Sugden
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215
发表时间: 1996-03-01
期刊: CEREBRAL CORTEX
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Bechara, A;Tranel, D;Damasio, AR
通讯作者: Damasio, AR
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3104
发表时间: 2003-02-21
影响因子: 2
作者:
Gintis, H
通讯作者: Gintis, H
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg180
发表时间: 2003-08-01
期刊: BRAIN
影响因子: 14.5
作者:
Fellows, LK;Farah, MJ
通讯作者: Farah, MJ
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2272-08.2008
发表时间: 2008-08-13
期刊: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子: --
作者:
Rudebeck PH;Murray EA
通讯作者: Murray EA