Longitudinal Tracking of Sound Exposure and Hearing Aid Usage through Objective Data Logs.

Longitudinal Tracking of Sound Exposure and Hearing Aid Usage through Objective Data Logs.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0194599818766056
复制
发表时间:
2018-07
期刊:
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Golub JS
Golub JS
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Doyle JB;Raghunathan RR;Cellum I;Li G;Golub JS

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

使用数据记录技术客观地跟踪和识别助听器(HA)使用和辅助声音暴露的预测因素。计划收集数据的病例系列。高等医学中心。纳入了2007年至2016年期间患有HA的个体(N = 431;平均年龄为74.6岁; 95% CI为73.1-76.0)。新一代HA固有的数据记录技术可以跟踪使用情况和声音暴露。通过多变量线性回归,年龄、性别、听力学就诊次数、听力学随访持续时间、纯音平均值和HA侧被评估为使用(小时/天)和辅助声音暴露(dB-小时/天;即,每天声音的“剂量”)的预测因素。平均随访时间为319天(95% CI,277-360)。平均HA使用时间为8.4小时/天(95% CI,8.0-8.8; N = 431)。平均辅助声暴露为440 dB-小时/天(95% CI,385-493; n = 110)。HA使用(β < 0.001,P = 0.45)和辅助声音暴露(β =-0.006,P = 0.87)均随时间推移保持稳定。HA使用仅与听力损失水平相关(纯音平均值; β = 0.030,P = 0.04)。辅助声音暴露仅与听力学随访时间相关(β = 0.100,P = 0.02)。虽然HA使用的测量传统上依赖于主观报告,但数据记录提供了一种客观工具来纵向跟踪HA使用和声音暴露。我们证明了使用这个潜在的强大的研究工具的可行性。在整个研究期间,患者的使用和声音暴露保持稳定。在听力损失较大的受试者中,使用率更高。通过持续的听力学随访访视,最大限度地提高辅助声音暴露可能是可能的。
To use data-logging technology to objectively track and identify predictors of hearing aid (HA) usage and aided sound exposure. Case series with planned data collection. Tertiary academic medical center. Individuals with HAs between 2007 and 2016 were included (N = 431; mean, 74.6 years; 95% CI, 73.1–76.0). Data-logging technology intrinsic to new-generation HAs was enabled to track usage and sound exposure. With multivariable linear regression, age, sex, number of audiology visits, duration of audiologic follow-up, pure tone average, and HA side were assessed as predictors of usage (hours/day) and aided sound exposure (dB-hours/day; ie, “dose” of sound per day). Mean follow-up was 319 days (95% CI, 277–360). Mean HA usage was 8.4 hours/day (95% CI, 8.0–8.8; N = 431). Mean aided sound exposure was 440 dB-hours/day (95% CI, 385–493; n = 110). HA use (β < 0.001, P = .45) and aided sound exposure (β = −0.006, P = .87) were both stable over time. HA usage was associated only with hearing loss level (pure tone average; β = 0.030, P = .04). Aided sound exposure was associated only with duration of audiologic follow-up (β = 0.100, P = .02). While measurement of HA use has traditionally relied on subjective reporting, data logging offers an objective tool to longitudinally track HA use and sound exposure. We demonstrate the feasibility of using this potentially powerful research tool. Usage and sound exposure were stable among patients throughout the study period. Use was greater among subjects with greater hearing loss. Maximizing aided sound exposure might be possible through continued audiology follow-up visits.
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
发表时间: 2011-02
影响因子: --
作者:
Lin, Frank R.;Metter, E. Jeffrey;O'Brien, Richard J.;Resnick, Susan M.;Zonderman, Alan B.;Ferrucci, Luigi
通讯作者: Ferrucci, Luigi
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1174890
发表时间: 2016-01-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Dettman, Shani;Choo, Dawn;Dowell, Richard
通讯作者: Dowell, Richard
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00003
发表时间: 1999-08-01
期刊: EAR AND HEARING
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Taubman, LB;Palmer, CV;Pratt, S
通讯作者: Pratt, S
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14848
发表时间: 2017-08
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Golub JS;Luchsinger JA;Manly JJ;Stern Y;Mayeux R;Schupf N
通讯作者: Schupf N
DOI: 10.3109/03005369609077930
发表时间: 1996-02-01
期刊: BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
Brooks, DN
通讯作者: Brooks, DN