Less Maladaptiveness of the Maladaptive Coping Styles in Japan than in Germany: Cross-cultural Comparison of Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping Styles

Less Maladaptiveness of the Maladaptive Coping Styles in Japan than in Germany: Cross-cultural Comparison of Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping Styles
复制标题

日本适应不良应对方式的适应不良程度低于德国:适应性和适应不良应对方式的跨文化比较

DOI:
10.1007/s41811-022-00143-z
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Hashimoto Kazuyuki
Hashimoto Kazuyuki
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nishiguchi Yuki;Ishikawa Ryotaro;Ishigaki Takuma;Hashimoto Kazuyuki

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

适应不良和适应性应对方式问卷 (MAX) 是一种用于测量应对方式的综合工具,包括三个子量表:适应不良应对、适应性应对和回避。这项研究开发了日本版的 MAX,并评估了日本样本和德国样本之间的应对方式和精神病理学之间的关系。为了进行跨文化比较,我们使用了 Moritz 等人获得的日本社区样本和德国数据集。 (情感障碍杂志 191:300–307,)。使用日本版 MAX 进行因子分析。参考原始版本,我们假设了三因素结构。然而,结果表明,适应性应对子量表与原始版本的相似度较低,而适应不良应对和回避子量表与原始版本相似。文化比较的结果是,日本参与者表现出更多的适应不良应对和回避。此外,在本研究中,与德国样本相比,适应不良的应对方式与日本样本中的精神病理学的相关性较弱。
The Maladaptive and Adaptive Coping Style Questionnaire (MAX) is a comprehensive tool for measuring coping styles including three subscales: maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, and avoidance. This study developed a Japanese version of MAX and evaluated the relationship between the coping styles and psychopathologies between the Japanese sample and the German sample. For the cross-cultural comparison, we used the Japanese community sample and German data set acquired by Moritz et al. (Journal of Affective Disorders191:300–307, ). Factor analysis was conducted with the Japanese version of the MAX. Referring to the original version, we hypothesized the three-factor structure. However, the results showed that the adaptive coping subscale had less similarity to the original version, whereas the maladaptive coping and avoidance subscales were similar to the original. As the result of cultural comparison, the Japanese participants showed more maladaptive coping and avoidance. Moreover, the maladaptive coping styles had weaker correlations with the psychopathologies in the Japanese sample than with those in the German sample in the present study.
DOI: 10.1111/jcap.12102
发表时间: 2015-02-01
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Young, Cara;Dietrich, Mary
通讯作者: Dietrich, Mary
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Autonomic Neuroscience
影响因子: --
作者:
Y. Sugawara;Izumi Hiramoto;Hideya Kodama
通讯作者: Hideya Kodama
DOI: 10.1037/a0023598
发表时间: 2012-02-01
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Aldao, Amelia;Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
通讯作者: Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Gross, JJ;John, OP
通讯作者: John, OP
澳大利亚和日本学生在决策自尊、决策压力和应对方式方面的差异
DOI: 10.1177/0022022193243002
发表时间: 1993
影响因子: 3
作者:
M. Radford;L. Mann;Y. Ohta;Y. Nakane
通讯作者: Y. Nakane