Differences in carbon cycle and temperature projections from emission- and concentration-driven earth system model simulations
Differences in carbon cycle and temperature projections from emission- and concentration-driven earth system model simulations
复制标题
排放和浓度驱动的地球系统模型模拟的碳循环和温度预测差异
DOI:
10.5194/esdd-5-991-2014
复制
发表时间:
2014-08
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zeng Xiaodong
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shao Pu;Xubin Zeng;Zeng Xiaodong
Abstract. The influence of prognostic and prescribed atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]) on the carbon uptake and temperature is investigated using all eight Earth System Models (ESMs) with relevant output variables from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Under the RCP8.5 scenario, the projected [CO2] differences in 2100 vary from −19.7 to +207.3 ppm in emission-driven ESMs. Incorporation of the interactive concentrations also increases the range of global warming, computed as the 20 year average difference between 2081–2100 and 1850–1869/1861–1880, by 49% from 2.36 K (i.e. ranging from 3.11 to 5.47 K) in the concentration-driven simulations to 3.51 K in the emission-driven simulations. The observed seasonal amplitude of global [CO2] from 1980–2011 is about 1.2–5.3 times as large as those from the eight emission-driven ESMs, while the [CO2] seasonality is simply neglected in concentration-driven ESMs, suggesting the urgent need of ESM improvements in this area. The temperature-concentration feedback parameter α is more sensitive to [CO2] (e.g. during 1980–2005 versus 2075–2100) than how [CO2] is handled (i.e. prognostic versus prescribed). This sensitivity can be substantially reduced by using a more appropriate parameter α' computed from the linear regression of temperature change versus that of the logarithm of [CO2]. However, the inter-model relative variations of both α and α' remain large, suggesting the need of more detailed studies to understand and hopefully reduce these discrepancies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
K. Zickfeld;M. Eby;A. Weaver;K. Alexander;E. Crespin;N. Edwards;A. Eliseev;G. Feulner;T. Fichefet-T.
通讯作者:
K. Zickfeld;M. Eby;A. Weaver;K. Alexander;E. Crespin;N. Edwards;A. Eliseev;G. Feulner;T. Fichefet-T.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
van Vuuren, Detlef P.;Edmonds, Jae;Rose, Steven K.
通讯作者:
Rose, Steven K.
DOI:
10.5194/esd-5-423-2014
发表时间:
2014-12
期刊:
Earth System Dynamics Discussions
影响因子:
--
作者:
F. Zhao;N. Zeng
通讯作者:
F. Zhao;N. Zeng
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Friedlingstein, Pierre;Meinshausen, Malte;Knutti, Reto
通讯作者:
Knutti, Reto
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Boer, G. J.;Arora, V. K.
通讯作者:
Arora, V. K.