Experimental manipulations of perspective taking and perspective switching in expressive writing
Experimental manipulations of perspective taking and perspective switching in expressive writing
复制标题
表达性写作中视角采择和视角切换的实验操作
DOI：
10.1080/02699931.2010.512123
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
J. Pennebaker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Seih;Cindy K. Chung;J. Pennebaker
先前的研究表明，那些在表达写作过程中自然改变代词用法的人，随后会报告说，他们的身心健康得到了最大的改善。为了探索可能的视角选择或视角转换效应，两项研究从第一人称、第二人称或第三人称视角操纵了关于情感事件的写作视角。在研究1中，55名学生被随机分配到三种写作视角中的一种，并被要求在三个5分钟的写作课程中从相同的视角写作。在研究2中，129名学生进行了三次5分钟的写作，以平衡的顺序从每个角度写一篇文章。结果表明，无论是采取视角还是转换视角，第一人称写作都能带来更多的感知利益，并与更多的认知机制词的使用有关。
Previous studies suggest that those who naturally vary their pronoun use over the course of expressive writing subsequently report the greatest improvements in physical and mental health. To explore possible perspective taking or perspective switching effects, two studies manipulated writing perspectives about emotional events from either a first-person, second-person, or third-person perspective. In Study 1, 55 students were randomly assigned to one of the three writing perspectives and were asked to write from the same perspective for three 5-minute writing sessions. In Study 2, 129 students wrote for three 5-minute sessions, one from each perspective in a counterbalanced order. The results showed that writing from a first-person perspective conferred more perceived benefits and was associated with using more cognitive mechanism words, whether engaged in perspective taking or perspective switching.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
J. Pennebaker;J. Kiecolt-Glaser;R. Glaser
通讯作者：
J. Pennebaker;J. Kiecolt-Glaser;R. Glaser
适应性丧亲的语言预测因素。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Pennebaker,JW;Mayne,TJ;Francis,ME
通讯作者：
Francis,ME
披露创伤事件对精神病监狱囚犯疾病行为的影响。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Richards,JM;Beal,WE;Seagal,JD;Pennebaker,JW
通讯作者：
Pennebaker,JW