Mapping Sustainable Development Goals 8, 9, 12, 13 and 15 through a decolonial lens: falling short of 'transforming our world'.
Mapping Sustainable Development Goals 8, 9, 12, 13 and 15 through a decolonial lens: falling short of 'transforming our world'.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11625-022-01112-3
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Requena-I-Mora M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Krauss JE;Jiménez Cisneros A;Requena-I-Mora M
联合国的可持续发展目标（UN sdg）希望实现一体化和不可分割，平衡可持续发展的三个层面，并通过超越先前商定的语言来改变我们的世界。我们着眼于去殖民化和公平，通过分析五个目标、目标和相互关联的指标（特别是经济-生态领域）来探讨这些愿望是否得到满足：可持续发展目标8（经济增长）、9（工业和创新）、12（可持续生产和消费）、13（气候行动）和15（陆地上的生命）。我们检查两个相互关联的焦点。根据联合国官方数据，在绘制了这些目标指标之间存在的联系之后，我们通过非殖民化的视角审视了可持续发展目标8、9、12、13和15中的定义和描述，重点关注普遍性、缺位性和现代性-殖民性。第二步调查这些框架对公平的影响，使用指标数据来说明持久的不公正。因此，我们最初的贡献是以新颖的方式将可持续发展和非殖民化文献结合起来，在这五个可持续发展目标、目标和指标的细节中追溯这些联系和矛盾、它们的知识遗产及其公平含义。我们发现，权衡取舍、缺位和正义缺失使可持续发展目标不让任何一个人掉队，同时维护人类、地球、繁荣、和平与繁荣的进步的目标难以实现。我们认识到可持续发展目标提供了重新思考我们希望如何在这个世界上共存的机会。然而，我们认为，认识到缺失、权衡和公平缺陷是通过可持续发展目标实现正义和可持续性真正转变的关键先决条件。
The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) aspire to be integrated and indivisible, balance the three dimensions of sustainable development and transform our world by going beyond previously agreed language. Focusing on decoloniality and equity, we explore whether these aspirations are met in analysing five goals, their targets and indicators interlinking especially the economy–ecology spheres: SDGs 8 (economic growth), 9 (industry and innovation), 12 (sustainable production and consumption), 13 (climate action) and 15 (life on land). We examine two interconnected foci. Having mapped the connections which exist, according to official UN data, between these goals’ indicators, we examine definitions and delineations in SDGs 8, 9, 12, 13 and 15 through a decolonial lens, focusing on universality, absences and modernity–coloniality. A second step investigates the equity implications of these framings, using indicator data to illustrate abiding injustices. Our original contribution is thus retracing these connections and contradictions, their intellectual heritage and their equity implications in the detail of these five SDGs, their targets and indicators, combining the sustainable development and decolonial literatures in novel ways. We find that trade-offs, absences and justice shortcomings call into question the attainment of the SDGs’ objectives of leaving no one behind while safeguarding advances for people, planet, prosperity, peace and prosperity. We recognize the SDGs’ opportunity to rethink how we want to co-exist in this world. However, we argue that recognizing absences, trade-offs and equity shortcomings are key prerequisites to attain genuine transformations for justice and sustainability through the SDGs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Bringezu, Stefan
通讯作者：
Bringezu, Stefan
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Brand, Ulrich;Wissen, Markus
通讯作者：
Wissen, Markus
影响因子：
7
作者：
Anguelovski, Isabelle;Martinez Alier, Joan
通讯作者：
Martinez Alier, Joan
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
de Saille, Stevienna;Medvecky, Fabien
通讯作者：
Medvecky, Fabien
DOI：
10.1007/s10784-016-9320-2
发表时间：
2016-06-01
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Chasek, Pamela S.;Wagner, Lynn M.
通讯作者：
Wagner, Lynn M.