The Role of Engagement in Effective, Digital Prevention Interventions: the Function of Engagement in the REAL Media Substance Use Prevention Curriculum.

The Role of Engagement in Effective, Digital Prevention Interventions: the Function of Engagement in the REAL Media Substance Use Prevention Curriculum.
复制标题

参与在有效的,数字预防干预措施中的作用:实际媒体药物使用预防课程中参与的功能。

DOI:
10.1007/s11121-020-01181-9
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hecht ML
Hecht ML
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Greene K;Choi HJ;Glenn SD;Ray AE;Hecht ML

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

预防课程依靠听众的参与来有效地传达信息。然而,到目前为止,参与度的测量主要集中在自我报告上,这通常是一个喜欢或满意度的指标。提供干预措施的新兴技术不仅有望提供更多的参与指标,而且还有望在课堂交付等传统工具之外进行传播。本研究以积极参与理论为基础,探讨了参与(通过自我报告、项目分析和观察来衡量)在短期药物使用预防结果中的作用,如自我效能,以对抗争论、描述性和禁令性规范。该研究追踪了4-H青少年(N = 310),他们参与了以媒体素养为重点的电子学习物质预防课程REAL media。结果表明,参与的自我报告预测了自我效能,但剂量的程序分析指标预测了较低的禁令和描述性规范,均在三个月时。观察性指标与自我效能感相关,但在预测模型中不显著。讨论了如何在预防中测量参与并将其纳入研究项目效果的未来研究的含义和方向。临床试验:NCT03157700, 2017年5月
Prevention curricula rely on audience engagement to effectively communicate their messages. However, to date, measurement of engagement has primarily focused on self-report that is often an indicator of liking or satisfaction. Emerging technologies for intervention delivery hold promise not only for additional engagement indicators but also for dissemination outside of traditional vehicles such as classroom delivery. The present study, grounded in the Theory of Active Involvement, explores the role of engagement (as measured by self-report, program analytics, and observation) with short term substance use prevention outcomes such as self-efficacy to counter-argue and descriptive and injunctive norms. The study tracks 4-H youth (N = 310) engaged with a media literacy focused e-learning substance prevention curriculum, REAL media. Results indicate that self-reports of engagement predicted self-efficacy to counter-argue, but a program-analytic indicator of dosage predicted lower injunctive and descriptive norms, all at three months. The observational indicator was correlated with self-efficacy to counter-argue but not significant in the predictive models. The implications and directions for future research regarding how engagement is measured in prevention and included in studying program effects are discussed. Clinical trial: NCT03157700, May 2017
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby119
发表时间: 2019-12-01
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Dopp, Alex R.;Parisi, Kathryn E.;Lyon, Aaron R.
通讯作者: Lyon, Aaron R.
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-009-0156-7
发表时间: 2010-06-01
期刊: PREVENTION SCIENCE
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Gottfredson, Denise C.;Cross, Amanda;Connell, Nadine
通讯作者: Connell, Nadine
DOI: 10.1007/s10935-018-00532-1
发表时间: 2019-02-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Hansen, William B.;Fleming, Charles B.;Scheier, Lawrence M.
通讯作者: Scheier, Lawrence M.
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.762824
发表时间: 2013-10-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Greene, Kathryn
通讯作者: Greene, Kathryn
DOI: 10.1177/002204260603600107
发表时间: 2006-12-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Elek, E;Miller-Day, M;Hecht, ML
通讯作者: Hecht, ML