Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous?

Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous?
复制标题

是否可以训练年轻的驾驶员来扫描信息,以降低很难确定为危险的道路交通情况的风险?

DOI:
10.1080/00140130802550232
复制
发表时间:
2009-06
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Fisher DL
Fisher DL
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pradhan AK;Pollatsek A;Knodler M;Fisher DL

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

年轻司机(18-21岁)过度卷入撞车事故。研究表明,这种过度参与的原因之一是他们未能扫描道路区域,以获取有关危险情况下潜在风险的信息,但并不明显。本研究的主要目标是制定和评估一项针对这一失败的培训计划。据推测,基于PC的危险预测培训将增加年轻司机在开放道路上扫描潜在危险的可能性。为了验证这一假设,12名受过培训的司机和12名未受过培训的司机在当地住宅、支线和主干道上驾驶车辆时,测量了他们的眼球运动。总体而言,受过培训的司机比未受培训的司机(37.4%)更有可能盯着与降低风险相关的信息所在的道路区域(64.4%)。甚至在道路上的情况下也观察到了显著的训练效果,这些情况与训练中显示的情况有很大不同。这些发现对青少年司机的培训类型有明确的影响,这是必要的,以提高他们对危险的预期。
Younger drivers (18–21 years) are over-involved in crashes. Research suggests that one of the reasons for this over-involvement is their failure to scan areas of the roadway for information about potential risks in situations that are hazardous, but not obviously so. The primary objective of the present study is to develop and evaluate a training program that addresses this failure. It was hypothesised that PC-based hazard anticipation training would increase the likelihood that younger drivers would scan for potential hazards on the open road. In order to test this hypothesis, 12 trained and 12 untrained drivers' eye movements were measured as they drove a vehicle on local residential, feeder and arterial roads. Overall, the trained drivers were significantly more likely to gaze at areas of the roadway that contained information relevant to the reduction of risks (64.4%) than were the untrained drivers (37.4%). Significant training effects were observed even in situations on the road that were quite different from those shown in training. These findings have clear implications for the type of training of teen drivers that is necessary in order to increase their anticipation of hazards.
DOI: 10.1518/001872005775570961
发表时间: 2005-12-01
期刊: HUMAN FACTORS
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Pradhan, AK;Hammel, KR;Fisher, DL
通讯作者: Fisher, DL
DOI: 10.1002/acp.806
发表时间: 2002-05-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Crundall, D;Underwood, G;Chapman, P
通讯作者: Chapman, P
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00183
发表时间: 1999-09-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Henderson, JM;Hollingworth, A
通讯作者: Hollingworth, A
DOI: 10.1080/00140130701318723
发表时间: 2007-08-01
期刊: ERGONOMICS
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Groeger, J. A.;Banks, A. P.
通讯作者: Banks, A. P.
DOI: 10.1518/001872006778606787
发表时间: 2006-09-01
期刊: HUMAN FACTORS
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Pollatsek, Alexander;Narayanaan, Vinod;Fisher, Donald L.
通讯作者: Fisher, Donald L.