On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.

On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
复制标题

关于识别记忆中基于强度和基于频率的镜像效应的差异。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Wixted
J. Wixted
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vincent Stretch;J. Wixted

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

镜像效果可以通过操纵词类(例如,高频对低频)或通过操纵强度(例如,短vs长学习时间)。5个实验的结果表明,基于强度的镜像效应是由决策标准的位置偏移引起的,而基于频率的镜像效应发生,尽管该标准相对于词频保持固定。一系列的研究提供了支持这些说法的证据,在这些研究中,高频(HF)词在列表呈现过程中得到了不同的加强(有时是不同的颜色)。这种操作增加了高频命中率高于低频(LF)单词,而没有选择性地降低高频误报率,正如词频镜像效应的固定标准解释所预测的那样。
A mirror effect can be produced by manipulating word class (e.g., high vs. low frequency) or by manipulating strength (e.g., short vs. long study time). The results of 5 experiments reported here suggest that a strength-based mirror effect is caused by a shift in the location of the decision criterion, whereas a frequency-based mirror effect occurs although the criterion remains fixed with respect to word frequency. Evidence supporting these claims is provided by a series of studies in which high frequency (HF) words were differentially strengthened (and sometimes differentially colored) during list presentation. That manipulation increased the HF hit rate above that for low frequency (LF) words without selectively decreasing the HF false alarm rate, just as a fixed-criterion account of the word-frequency mirror effect predicts.
人类的学习和记忆。
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003215
发表时间: 1987
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者: Hasher,L
DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.946
发表时间: 1994
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Greene,RL;Thapar,A
通讯作者: Thapar,A
类别长度和强度对识别熟悉度的影响。
DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.267
发表时间: 1995
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Shiffrin,RM;Huber,DE;Marinelli,K
通讯作者: Marinelli,K