Increasing flavonoid contents of tomato fruits through disruption of the SlSPL-CNR, a suppressor of SlMYB12 transcription activity.
Increasing flavonoid contents of tomato fruits through disruption of the SlSPL-CNR, a suppressor of SlMYB12 transcription activity.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/pbi.14214
复制
发表时间:
2024-02
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Qu, Guiqin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhou, Leilei;Sun, Zongyan;Hu, Tingting;Chen, Di;Chen, Xue;Zhang, Qiaoli;Cao, Jiankang;Zhu, Benzhong;Fu, Daqi;Zhu, Hongliang;Qu, Guiqin
Fruits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) are rich in nutrients and generally served as critical resources for human diet. In fruit pericarps, the peel tissues adhering to the flesh produce functional components including flavonoids that are indeed mixed polyphenolic compounds. Flavonoids play an essential role in determining peel colour and are proven to be functionally important for human health as favourable hydrophilic antioxidants (Ballester et al., 2010). However, the content of endogenous flavonoids in numerous fruits including tomato tends to be inadequate and fails to meet the requirement of health benefits. Therefore, digging in essential flavonoid-regulated genes and further breeding of tomato fruits rich in flavonoids is a significant target for tomato improvement in quality. Flavonoid biosynthesis is derived from the phenylpropanoid pathway and undergoes combinatorial transformations by a series of enzymes, which are mainly controlled by flavonoid biosynthetic genes. SlMYB12, a R2R3-MYB transcription factor, was uncovered to be a master regulator in flavonoid biosynthesis by extensively targeting and activating the transcription of flavonoid biosynthetic genes (Adato et al., 2009). Disruption of SlMYB12 gene resulted in the decreased accumulation of naringenin chalcone and a pink-coloured tomato fruit (Ballester et al., 2010), indicating that modulation of SlMYB12 could be an efficient strategy in controlling flavonoid biosynthesis in tomato peel. Apart from its significant role in mediating flavonoid content, the molecular basis underlying the transcriptional activity of SlMYB12 remains largely unknown. The tomato SBP-box protein Colorless Non-ripening (SlSPL-CNR, referred as to SlCNR) was early cloned and studied as a master ripening transcription factor. While we recently found that fruits of the slcnr mutants generated by CRIPSR/Cas9 system can turn to full red, which are distinct from the original Cnr mutant that fails to ripen (Gao et al., 2019). Herein, we further investigated the maturity characteristics in fruits of the slcnr mutants (slcnr-16, slcnr-22 and slcnr-23) with the complete deficiency of SlCNR protein (Figure S1) and found that they only exhibited an approximately 3-day delay in ripening initiation and a slight decreased lycopene content (Figure S2). These results demonstrated that SlCNR is not a master regulator of fruit ripening, and its mutation does not change the overall ripening process. Western blot analysis using the anti-SlCNR polyclonal antibody revealed that SlCNR protein dominantly expresses in fruits (Figure 1a). Moreover, the peel tissues harbour obviously more abundant SlCNR protein than the flesh (Figure 1b), indicating that SlCNR may be functionally important in modulating the development of fruit peel. Intriguingly, fruits of the slcnr mutants exhibited a yellow-orange colour appearance during the ripening, while the wild-type appeared to red rapidly, and the former harboured a deeper yellow-coloured peel tissues than the later (Figure 1c).To further investigate the regulation role of SlCNR on fruit colour, a comparative transcriptomic analysis was performed with high Pearson correlation coefficients (Figure S3). A total of 2165 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; fold change≥ 2 and P value< 0.05) were identified between Br and Br+ 7 wild-type fruits, of which 8%(187) and 92%(1978) were up-regulated and down-regulated in Br+ 7 fruits, respectively (Figure S4a, Table S1). In slcnr-23 mutant, 1603 DEGs were identified between Br and Br+ 7 fruits, of which 21%(341) were upregulated and 78%(1162) were down-regulated in Br+ 7 fruits (Figure S4b, Table S2). Compared with the wild-type, 362 and 573 DEGs were …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Zhu, Guangtao;Wang, Shouchuang;Huang, Sanwen
通讯作者:
Huang, Sanwen
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Ballester, Ana-Rosa;Molthoff, Jos;Bovy, Arnaud
通讯作者:
Bovy, Arnaud
影响因子:
8.7
作者:
Gao, Ying;Zhu, Ning;Qu, Guiqin
通讯作者:
Qu, Guiqin
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Adato A;Mandel T;Mintz-Oron S;Venger I;Levy D;Yativ M;Domínguez E;Wang Z;De Vos RC;Jetter R;Schreiber L;Heredia A;Rogachev I;Aharoni A
通讯作者:
Aharoni A