Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden: Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002

Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden: Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002
复制标题

授权类型和选区特征对议会演讲内容立场的影响——基于1998-2002年德国联邦议院议会辩论的调查

DOI:
10.1111/spsr.12094
复制
发表时间:
2002
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Hanna Bäck
Hanna Bäck
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hanna Bäck

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在议会发表演讲是当选代表向其政党和选民表明其政策议程和意识形态立场的一个关键因素。采取一个具体的纲领性立场可能会增加议员获得再次提名和再次赢得立法机构席位的机会。在本文中,我们建立在响应行为的政治行为者和委托代理理论的方法,并询问哪些变量可以解释议员在他们的演讲中所采取的纲领性立场。为了回答我们的研究问题,我们收集了1998年至2002年期间德国联邦议院议员发表的所有与经济政策问题有关的演讲。我们用计算机化的内容分析方法估计了他们各自的政策立场。联合收割机将这些数据与国会议员的特征、他们在政党、议会和政府中的地位以及社会经济结构和国会议员选区内的前选举结果相结合。研究结果表明,德国议员在议会发言时会考虑其选区的特点和经济问题压力,从而为德国议员的回应和选票寻求行为提供了经验证据。此外,政治和制度因素,如委员会或(前)内阁的成员资格以及国会议员的选举方式-直接或通过政党名单-发挥作用的程度,国会议员的纲领偏离党的路线。
Giving speeches in parliament is a key element of elected representatives for signalling their policy agenda and their ideological positions to their party and their electorate. Taking a specific programmatic position might increase the chances of an MP to get re-nominated and to win again a seat in the legislature. In this paper, we build on approaches of responsive behaviour of political actors and on principal agent theories and ask which variables can explain the programmatic positions adopted by MPs in their speeches. To answer our research question, we collected all speeches related to economic policy issues given by members of the German Bundestag in the time period between 1998 and 2002. We estimated their individual policy positions with computerised methods of content analysis. We combine this data with information on the characteristics of MPs, their position in party, parliament and government and, in addition, with the socioeconomic structure and former election results within the MPs' constituency. The results show that German MPs take the characteristics and the economic problem pressure of their constituencies into account when speaking in parliament, so that there is empirical evidence for responsive and vote-seeking behaviour of German MPs. In addition, political and institutional factors like the membership in committees or in (former) cabinets and the way how an MP was elected-directly or by party list-play a role for the degree of MP's programmatic deviation from the party line.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2009
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Thomas Bräuninger
通讯作者: Thomas Bräuninger
改革议会游戏规则:衡量和解释 1945 年至 2010 年奥地利、德国和瑞士议会规则的变化
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.591079
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Ulrich Sieberer;W. Müller;M. Heller
通讯作者: M. Heller
DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2012.742092
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
影响因子: --
作者:
Jochen Müller
通讯作者: Jochen Müller
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
F. U. Pappi;Susumu Shikano
通讯作者: Susumu Shikano
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02047.x
发表时间: 2012-08-01
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Braeuninger, Thomas;Brunner, Martin;Daeubler, Thomas
通讯作者: Daeubler, Thomas