Proactive control in early and middle childhood: An ERP study.

Proactive control in early and middle childhood: An ERP study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.dcn.2017.04.005
复制
发表时间:
2017-08
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Wiebe SA
Wiebe SA
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elke S;Wiebe SA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

儿童在向学校过渡的过程中经历了重要的认知控制改善。本研究考察了4 - 5岁儿童(n = 17)和7 - 8岁儿童(n = 22)主动部署认知控制的能力。孩子们执行了一个提示任务切换范式,给他们一个提示,指示他们应该使用哪个属性、颜色或形状来对即将到来的刺激进行分类。在提示和刺激下,我们分析了两个事件相关电位:P2和P3,分别反映认知控制的感觉和注意成分的正峰。根据提示,我们还分析了正慢波,索引工作记忆参与。我们预测,在需要切换任务的切换试验中,主动控制会导致更大的线索- p3振幅,反映出对切换需要的识别,以及更大的慢波振幅,反映出在线索后延迟中对新任务集的维护。这一模式在两个年龄组中都观察到了。在刺激下,在转换试验中,两个年龄组的刺激- p2潜伏期都较短,与加工促进一致。这些结果表明,4-5岁和7 - 8岁的儿童都积极参与认知控制。然而,年龄较大的儿童表现出更好的表现和更大的线索- p2振幅,这表明在儿童中期更有效的主动控制参与。
Children experience important cognitive control improvements in the transition to school. This study examined 4–5-year-olds’ (n = 17) and 7–8-year-olds’ (n = 22) ability to proactively deploy cognitive control. Children performed a cued task-switching paradigm presenting them with a cue indicating which attribute, color or shape, they should use to sort the upcoming stimulus. Following both cue and stimulus, we analyzed two event-related potentials: the P2 and P3, positive peaks reflecting sensory and attentional components of cognitive control, respectively. Following the cue, we also analyzed a positive slow-wave, indexing working memory engagement. We predicted that on switch trials, which required switching tasks, proactive control would result in larger cue-P3 amplitudes, reflecting recognition of the need to switch, and larger slow-wave amplitudes, reflecting maintenance of the new task-sets over the post-cue delay. This pattern was observed in both age groups. At the stimulus, in switch trials, both age groups had shorter stimulus-P2 latencies, consistent with processing facilitation. These results suggest that both 4–5- and 7–8-year-olds engaged cognitive control proactively. Older children, however, demonstrated better performance and larger cue-P2 amplitudes, suggesting more effective proactive control engagement in middle childhood.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.09.012
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: CORTEX
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Adrover-Roig, Daniel;Barcelo, Francisco
通讯作者: Barcelo, Francisco
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200210280-00011
发表时间: 2002-10-28
期刊: NEUROREPORT
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Barceló, F;Periáñez, JA;Knight, RT
通讯作者: Knight, RT
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00262.x
发表时间: 2005-01-01
期刊: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Kieffaber, PD;Hetrick, WP
通讯作者: Hetrick, WP
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2896(99)80049-x
发表时间: 1998-01-01
期刊: INTELLIGENCE
影响因子: 3
作者:
Houlihan, M;Stelmack, R;Campbell, K
通讯作者: Campbell, K
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810002106
发表时间: 2009-04-07
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Chatham, Christopher H.;Frank, Michael J.;Munakata, Yuko
通讯作者: Munakata, Yuko