Interpreting Whole-Genome Sequence Analyses of Foodborne Bacteria for Regulatory Applications and Outbreak Investigations.
Interpreting Whole-Genome Sequence Analyses of Foodborne Bacteria for Regulatory Applications and Outbreak Investigations.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3389/fmicb.2018.01482
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Strain E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pightling AW;Pettengill JB;Luo Y;Baugher JD;Rand H;Strain E
Whole-genome sequence (WGS) analysis has revolutionized the food safety industry by enabling high-resolution typing of foodborne bacteria. Higher resolving power allows investigators to identify origins of contamination during illness outbreaks and regulatory activities quickly and accurately. Government agencies and industry stakeholders worldwide are now analyzing WGS data routinely. Although researchers have published many studies that assess the efficacy of WGS data analysis for source attribution, guidance for interpreting WGS analyses is lacking. Here, we provide the framework for interpreting WGS analyses used by the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). We based this framework on the experiences of CFSAN investigators, collaborations and interactions with government and industry partners, and evaluation of the published literature. A fundamental question for investigators is whether two or more bacteria arose from the same source of contamination. Analysts often count the numbers of nucleotide differences [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] between two or more genome sequences to measure genetic distances. However, using SNP thresholds alone to assess whether bacteria originated from the same source can be misleading. Bacteria that are isolated from food, environmental, or clinical samples are representatives of bacterial populations. These populations are subject to evolutionary forces that can change genome sequences. Therefore, interpreting WGS analyses of foodborne bacteria requires a more sophisticated approach. Here, we present a framework for interpreting WGS analyses that combines SNP counts with phylogenetic tree topologies and bootstrap support. We also clarify the roles of WGS, epidemiological, traceback, and other evidence in forming the conclusions of investigations. Finally, we present examples that illustrate the application of this framework to real-world situations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Duchêne S;Holt KE;Weill FX;Le Hello S;Hawkey J;Edwards DJ;Fourment M;Holmes EC
通讯作者:
Holmes EC
影响因子:
6
作者:
Kruse, H
通讯作者:
Kruse, H
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Lambert, Dominic;Pightling, Arthur;Blais, Burton
通讯作者:
Blais, Burton
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1615910
发表时间:
2017-11-23
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Crowe SJ;Bottichio L;Shade LN;Whitney BM;Corral N;Melius B;Arends KD;Donovan D;Stone J;Allen K;Rosner J;Beal J;Whitlock L;Blackstock A;Wetherington J;Newberry LA;Schroeder MN;Wagner D;Trees E;Viazis S;Wise ME;Neil KP
通讯作者:
Neil KP
影响因子:
9.4
作者:
Chen Y;Luo Y;Pettengill J;Timme R;Melka D;Doyle M;Jackson A;Parish M;Hammack TS;Allard MW;Brown EW;Strain EA
通讯作者:
Strain EA