Brief mindfulness training for negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brief mindfulness training for negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/ccp0000324
复制
发表时间:
2018-07
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Creswell JD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schumer MC;Lindsay EK;Creswell JD
Over the last ten years, there has been a dramatic increase in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of brief mindfulness training (from single-session inductions to multi-session interventions lasting up to two weeks), with some preliminary indications that these training programs may improve mental health outcomes, such as negative affectivity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether brief mindfulness training reliably reduces negative affectivity. PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Mindfulness Research Monthly Newsletter were systematically searched for brief mindfulness intervention RCTs assessing negative affectivity outcomes (e.g., depression, rumination, anxiety, stress). 65 RCTs, including 5,489 participants predominantly without experience in meditation (64.64% female, mean age = 24.62), qualified for the meta-analytic review. The meta-analysis revealed a small but significant effect of brief mindfulness training on reducing negative affectivity compared to control programs (g=.21, p<.001). The overall effect size was significantly moderated by participant characteristics: community samples (g=.41, p<.001) produced larger training effects compared to student samples (g=.14, p=.001) (Qbetween p=.03). No significant effect size differences were found between clinical and non-clinical samples. However, when accounting for publication bias, the overall effect size of brief mindfulness training programs on negative affectivity was significantly reduced (g=.04). Brief mindfulness training programs are increasingly popular approaches for reducing negative affectivity. This meta-analysis indicates that brief mindfulness training modestly reduces negative affectivity. Quantitative analyses indicated the presence of publication bias (i.e., unpublished null effect studies), highlighting the need to continue rigorous evaluation of brief mindfulness interventions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Bergeron CM;Almgren-Doré I;Dandeneau S
通讯作者:
Dandeneau S
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Cavanagh, Kate;Strauss, Clara;Jones, Fergal
通讯作者:
Jones, Fergal
影响因子:
25.8
作者:
Bowen, Sarah;Witkiewitz, Katie;Clifasefi, Seema L.;Grow, Joel;Chawla, Neharika;Hsu, Sharon H.;Carroll, Haley A.;Harrop, Erin;Collins, Susan E.;Lustyk, M. Kathleen;Larimer, Mary E.
通讯作者:
Larimer, Mary E.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Adams, Claire E.;Benitez, Lindsay;Copeland, Amy L.
通讯作者:
Copeland, Amy L.
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Banks, Jonathan B.;Welhaf, Matthew S.;Srour, Alexandra
通讯作者:
Srour, Alexandra