Anti‐elite parties and political inequality: How challenges to the political mainstream reduce income gaps in internal efficacy
Anti‐elite parties and political inequality: How challenges to the political mainstream reduce income gaps in internal efficacy
复制标题
反精英政党与政治不平等：对政治主流的挑战如何缩小内部效能的收入差距
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christoph Nguyen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Marx;Christoph Nguyen
人们对不同收入群体的政治不平等越来越感兴趣。本文有助于这场辩论与两个参数的政治参与：贫困通过破坏认知和情感资源压抑内部的政治效能;和异议政党制度减少了效率差距，以更高的收入。具体来说，反精英和主流政党之间的冲突是可以预期的，以简化政治决策，并激发穷人选民的政治关注。这些论点得到了比较和实验分析的支持。比较调查数据显示，效率的收入差距随着政党制度中反精英突出性的新衡量标准而变化。反精英修辞的因果影响是通过一个有代表性的调查实验建立的。最后，本文探讨了这些机制如何影响选举和其他形式的政治参与。
There is growing interest in political inequality across income groups. This article contributes to this debate with two arguments about political involvement: poverty depresses internal political efficacy by undermining cognitive and emotional resources; and dissent in the party system reduces the efficacy gap to higher incomes. Specifically, conflict is to be expected between anti‐elite and mainstream parties to simplify political decisions and stimulate political attention among poor voters. These arguments are supported with comparative and experimental analyses. Comparative survey data shows that the income gap in efficacy varies with a novel measure of the anti‐elite salience in the party system. The causal impact of anti‐elite rhetoric is established though a representative survey experiment. Finally, the article investigates how these mechanisms affect both electoral and other forms of political participation.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
J. Lerner;D. Keltner
通讯作者：
J. Lerner;D. Keltner
选后调查中选民代表性过高、选票误报和投票率偏差
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Munzert
通讯作者：
Munzert
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Gallo, LC;Matthews, KA
通讯作者：
Matthews, KA