Bring voices from the coast into the Fukushima treated water debate.

Bring voices from the coast into the Fukushima treated water debate.
复制标题

将海岸的声音带入福岛治疗的水辩论。

DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2205431119
复制
发表时间:
2022-11-08
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

自日本福岛第一核电站事故以来,十多年已经过去了,但控制现场最有争议的方面才刚刚开始。日本政府已经批准了核电站运营商东京电力公司将处理后的水排放到太平洋的计划。这些水目前被储存在现场,并在处理后保留了一些放射性物质。释放这些水的决定引起了政治争论和社会关注。韩国、中国和台湾以及国际环境非政府组织都表示了强烈关注;日本的渔业合作社仍然反对释放,因为担心可能对福岛海鲜造成声誉影响。东京电力公司正在确认释放过程的具体细节,国际原子能机构(原子能机构)的一个工作队已在日本政府和东京电力公司的要求下多次访问了福岛第一核电站。这些版本计划于2023年开始,并运行多年。日本经济产业省成立的一个技术委员会建议释放处理过的水;日本政府或东京电力公司不太可能重新考虑他们的决定。因此,日本国内和国际上的技术和政策界的一个关键作用是确保在释放过程中确定和解决受影响利益攸关方的关切。然而,尽管全球科学政策对福岛第一核电站的处理水状况非常关注(1,2),但福岛当地渔民和沿海社区的关切在围绕福岛灾难后果的科学政策讨论中只受到有限的关注,他们是生活在核电站阴影下的主要利益攸关方,每天都将承受释放的后果。
More than a decade has passed since the accident at the Fukushima Dai’ichi nuclear power plant in Japan—but the most contentious aspect of bringing the site under control is only just beginning. The Japanese Government has approved plant operator TEPCO’s plan to release treated water into the Pacific Ocean. That water is currently being stored onsite and retains some radioactive substances after treatment. The decision to release this water has provoked political contention and societal concern. South Korea, China, and Taiwan, as well as international environmental nongovernmental organizations, have expressed strong concern; and fisheries cooperatives in Japan remain opposed to the releases for fear of possible reputational impacts on Fukushima seafood. TEPCO are confirming specific details of the release process, and an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) task force has made multiple visits to the Fukushima Dai’ichi site at the behest of the Japanese Government and TEPCO. The releases are scheduled to start in 2023 and run for many years. A technical committee within Japan, formed by the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, made the recommendation to release the treated water; it’s unlikely that the Japanese Government or TEPCO will revisit their decision. And so, a key role for technical and policy communities, both within Japan and internationally, is to ensure that the concerns of affected stakeholders are identified and addressed as the releases proceed. However, despite significant global science–policy interest in the treated water situation at Fukushima Dai’ichi (1, 2), the concerns of local fishers and coastal communities in Fukushima, key stakeholders living in the shadow of the nuclear site who will live with the consequences of the releases on a daily basis, have had only limited visibility in the science–policy discourse surrounding the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster.
DOI: 10.1068/a4611
发表时间: 2014-01-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Sundqvist, Goran
通讯作者: Sundqvist, Goran
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8218-5_3
发表时间: 2020-01-01
期刊: LOW-DOSE RADIATION EFFECTS ON ANIMALS AND ECOSYSTEMS: LONG-TERM STUDY ON THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT
影响因子: --
作者:
Morita, Takami;Ambe, Daisuke;Shigenobu, Yuya
通讯作者: Shigenobu, Yuya
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104881
发表时间: 2021-11-19
期刊: MARINE POLICY
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Zhang Xixi;Qu Tongkun;Wang Yecheng
通讯作者: Wang Yecheng
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112969
发表时间: 2021-09-21
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Bezhenar, R.;Takata, H.;Maderich, V
通讯作者: Maderich, V
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.900207
发表时间: 2014-11-26
影响因子: 5.1
作者:
Kasperson, Roger
通讯作者: Kasperson, Roger