Quantifier Polarity and Referential Focus during Reading
Quantifier Polarity and Referential Focus during Reading
复制标题
阅读时的量词极性和参考焦点
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Eugene J. Dawydiak
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Paterson;A. Sanford;L. Moxey;Eugene J. Dawydiak
We report the results of two eye-tracking experiments that examine how readers process sentences containing anaphoric pronouns when the referent is provided by a preceding quantified statement. Previous studies (Moxey & Sanford, 1987; Sanford, Moxey, & Paterson, 1996) have shown that positive and negative quantifiers (e.g.,a fewandfew,respectively) cause subjects to focus on different aspects of the described situation and have direct consequences for the interpretation of subsequent anaphoric pronouns. In the present studies, we consider whether positive and negative quantifiers make different sets available as the referents of subsequent anaphora or if readers must infer the nature of these sets on encountering the anaphor. The results suggest that positives do make sets available as referents, whereas in the case of negatives, readers must infer the referent set. The findings are consistent with linguistic arguments concerning the differences between positive and negative quantifiers and add to our understanding of complex plural anaphora.
DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.410
发表时间:
1988-07
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
作者:
Edward J. O'Brien;Dolores M. Shank;Jerome L. Myers;Keith Rayner
通讯作者:
Edward J. O'Brien;Dolores M. Shank;Jerome L. Myers;Keith Rayner
DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.16.2.250
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
作者:
Garrod,S;O'Brien,EJ;Morris,RK;Rayner,K
通讯作者:
Rayner,K