Comparing the efficiency of six common methods for DNA extraction from root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.)
Comparing the efficiency of six common methods for DNA extraction from root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.)
复制标题
比较从根部病变线虫(短体线虫属)中提取 DNA 的六种常用方法的效率
DOI:
10.1163/15685411-bja10049
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Orlando V
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Orlando V
Robust and accurate identification of root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchusspp.) is an essential step for determining their potential threat to crop yields and, consequently, development of an efficient agronomic management strategy. It is recognised that DNA-based techniques provide rapid identification of a range of plant-parasitic nematodes includingPratylenchusspp. Efficient and repeatable DNA extraction is central to molecular methodologies. Here, six common DNA extraction protocols were compared to evaluate their efficiency to obtain quality DNA samples forPratylenchus penetrans. Samples with five and ten individuals ofP. penetranswere successfully extracted and amplified by all extraction methods tested, whereas samples with a single nematode presented challenges for DNA amplification. Among all methods tested, the DNA extraction protocol with glass beads proved to be efficient forP. penetransand all other species tested (P. crenatus,P. neglectusandP. thornei), generating high quality DNA at comparatively low cost and with a rapid sample throughput.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Fanelli, E.;Troccoli, A.;De Luca, F.
通讯作者:
De Luca, F.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
V. Orlando;I. Grove;S. Edwards;T. Prior;D. Roberts;R. Neilson;M. Back
通讯作者:
M. Back
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Peetz;I. Zasada
通讯作者:
I. Zasada
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. T;Harris;J. L.;Sandall
通讯作者:
S. T;Harris;J. L.;Sandall
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
F. Mokrini;L. Waeyenberge;N. Viaene;Fouad Abbad Andaloussi;M. Moens
通讯作者:
F. Mokrini;L. Waeyenberge;N. Viaene;Fouad Abbad Andaloussi;M. Moens