Orexin signaling in rostral lateral hypothalamus and nucleus accumbens shell in the control of spontaneous physical activity in high- and low-activity rats.
Orexin signaling in rostral lateral hypothalamus and nucleus accumbens shell in the control of spontaneous physical activity in high- and low-activity rats.
复制标题
下丘脑头侧外侧和伏核壳中的食欲素信号传导控制高活动和低活动大鼠的自发身体活动。
DOI:
10.1152/ajpregu.00339.2016
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kotz,CatherineM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Perez-Leighton,Claudio;Little,MorganR;Grace,Martha;Billington,Charles;Kotz,CatherineM
Spontaneous physical activity (SPA) describes activity outside of formal exercise and shows large interindividual variability. The hypothalamic orexin/hypocretin peptides are key regulators of SPA. Orexins drive SPA within multiple brain sites, including rostral lateral hypothalamus (LH) and nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh). Rats with high basal SPA (high activity, HA) show higher orexin mRNA expression and SPA after injection of orexin-A in rostral LH compared with low-activity (LA) rats. Here, we explored the contribution of orexin signaling in rostral LH and NAcSh to the HA/LA phenotype. We found that HA rats have higher sensitivity to SPA after injection of orexin-A in rostral LH, but not in NAcSh. HA and LA rats showed similar levels of orexin receptor expression in rostral LH, and activation of orexin-producing neurons after orexin-A injection in rostral LH. Also, in HA and LA rats, the coinjection of orexin-A in rostral LH and NAcSh failed to further increase SPA beyond the effects of orexin-A in rostral LH. Pretreatment with muscimol, a GABAAreceptor agonist, in NAcSh potentiated SPA produced by orexin-A injection in rostral LH in HA but not in LA rats. Our results suggest that a feedback loop from orexin-responsive neurons in rostral LH to orexin neurons and a the NAcSh–orexin neuron–rostral LH circuit regulate SPA. Overall, our data suggest that differences in orexin sensitivity in rostral LH and its modulation by GABA afferents from NAcSh contribute to individual SPA differences.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
R. Scharpf;R. Irizarry;Matthew E. Ritchie;B. Carvalho;I. Ruczinski
通讯作者:
R. Scharpf;R. Irizarry;Matthew E. Ritchie;B. Carvalho;I. Ruczinski
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
M. Mullett;C. Billington;A. Levine;C. Kotz
通讯作者:
C. Kotz
DOI:
10.1152/ajpendo.00126.2003
发表时间:
2004-04-01
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Kiwaki, K;Kotz, CM;Levine, JA
通讯作者:
Levine, JA
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
A. N. Acad;Sci;C. Kotz;J. Nixon;T. Butterick;C. Perez-Leighton;J. Teske;C. Billington
通讯作者:
A. N. Acad;Sci;C. Kotz;J. Nixon;T. Butterick;C. Perez-Leighton;J. Teske;C. Billington
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.95.1.322
发表时间:
1998-01-06
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
De Lecea, L;Kilduff, TS;Sutcliffe, JG
通讯作者:
Sutcliffe, JG